1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

YouTube · Post by **recte44** » Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:19 pm

Details of the SaMLB'er Program

You must have at least 20 PP's to participate in this draft. If you're listed here and don't want to participate, just say NO. In order to speed this up, if you want to participate, please send me a list of interested guys and "instructions" via PM by no later than the "Preseason" Sim.

1. Long Beach- Derrick Gibson, OF
2. Louisville
3. Omaha
4. Hawaii
5. Montreal
6. Chicago
7. Phoenix- NO PICK, UNDER 20 PP
8. Hackensack (Charlotte)
9. New Orleans
10. Washington- Curtis King, P
11. Atlantic City
12. Greenville
13. Seattle
14. Birmingham
15. Des Moines
16. Valencia
17. Baltimore
18. Calgary
19. Las Vegas- Amaury Garcia, IF/OF
20. California
21. Marquette
22. Madison
23. Buffalo
24. Vancouver

paul j kiggins · Post by **paul j kiggins** » Thu Mar 24, 2011 2:20 am

Omaha = NO

wualumni · Post by **wualumni** » Thu Mar 24, 2011 6:17 am

Montreal - No

scottsdale_joe · Post by **scottsdale_joe** » Fri Mar 25, 2011 9:02 am

Vancouver will pass this year

bschr682 · Post by **bschr682** » Fri Mar 25, 2011 9:20 am

KCCardinalFan · Post by **KCCardinalFan** » Fri Mar 25, 2011 9:26 am

7teen · Post by **7teen** » Fri Mar 25, 2011 9:29 am

jiminyhopkins · Post by **jiminyhopkins** » Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:38 pm

Question:

Why is everyone passing? Is this not a good deal? Do the players have the ability to help out a team immediately? I was considering it, but I'm not so sure now.

aaronweiner · Post by **aaronweiner** » Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:53 pm

Well, you have to have a major leaguer you'd really like to have. Plus, it's hard to get someone recognizable; I wouldn't mind drafting Orlando Miller but he's got too many at bats. That kinda thing.

aaronweiner · Post by **aaronweiner** » Sat Mar 26, 2011 1:01 pm

Incidentally, we can choose players who retired in 1999, right?

scottsdale_joe · Post by **scottsdale_joe** » Sat Mar 26, 2011 3:23 pm

aaronweiner wrote:Incidentally, we can choose players who retired in 1999, right?

Right
The list is here:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... year.shtml

scottsdale_joe · Post by **scottsdale_joe** » Sat Mar 26, 2011 3:24 pm

aaronweiner wrote:Well, you have to have a major leaguer you'd really like to have. Plus, it's hard to get someone recognizable; I wouldn't mind drafting Orlando Miller but he's got too many at bats. That kinda thing.

Orlando Miller retired in 1997 so he wouldn't be eligible this year.
This year's list is here:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/leagu ... year.shtml

I drafted one each the last two years.
Mark Brandenburg still has some potential; the other guy, not so much.

EchoesIE · Post by **EchoesIE** » Sat Mar 26, 2011 3:30 pm

Hawaii has neither the interest, nor the PPT's for this.

YouTube · Post by **recte44** » Thu Mar 31, 2011 8:43 am

Last call for this....

YouTube · Post by **recte44** » Thu Mar 31, 2011 9:32 am

Three pretty decent specs bought here this year. King looks like a plus reliever, Gibson a power bat, and Garcia at least a platoon bat.

All tracked.

The Brewster

The Brewster

1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Re: 1999-2000 SaMLB'er Draft

Who is online