2041: Offensive Explosion - A Look at Stat Rates

Beat articles, power rankings, statistical analysis, etc. goes here.
User avatar
RonCo
GB: JL Frontier Division Director
Posts: 22170
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
Has thanked: 2442 times
Been thanked: 4011 times

2041: Offensive Explosion - A Look at Stat Rates

Post by RonCo » Fri Mar 06, 2020 1:38 pm

Image
Here’s the thing we all know even if Randy’s posts about the number of teams dropping historic seasons weren’t around. Offense was up all around the league. We would know it because of our pitchers, mostly, I suppose. I mean, we’ve all thrown a rag-tag arm or three out there only to see him come back on his shield.

And here’s the basic proof.

Stat20402041
R/G4.985.43

Run scoring was up nearly half a run a game from last year—a massive jump. Unprecedented in BBA history as far as I can tell. We’ve seen jumps before, of course. Some as high a .35 or so. But this one was a pretty danged big jump.

And here’s the thing—unlike in that weird MLB thing some people keep talking about, the jump in runs has nothing to do with big flies, nada about homers, zippo to do with round trippers. You get the idea, right? While chicks still dig the long ball, I hear, the BBA upsurge in runs is all about the basics—putting the ball into play, taking extra bases, cutting down on Ks, and getting on base.

Don’t believe me?

Here’s some more numbers, first a look at hits and hit types and their rates from year-to-year:

Stat20402041
AVG0.2640.275
BABIP0.2970.309
1B/AB0.1610.171
2B/AB0.0560.059
3B/AB0.0070.008
HR/AB0.0390.038

WE see batting average jumped massively, and none of that was related to homers. In fact, the home run rate dropped in 2041. Not massively. Probably in the noise, really. But the fact is clear that the dinger rate did not rise whereas everything else did, particularly the lowly base hit—which our batters also then converted to doubles and triples at extended rates with respect to At Bats (there’s the thing when it comes to that Gap rating that a lot of people want to discount).

The bottom line to my eyes is BABIP—which skyrocketed twelve points, resulting in higher averages, and more extra base hits.

This is a big-assed deal all on its own, but let’s take a look at two other “true outcomes,” strike outs and walks:

Stat20402041
K/AB0.2120.204
BB/PA0.080.088

We see strikeouts were down a little under 4%. This is a big deal because every strikeout reduces the effect of balls in play (hence BABIP, which we’ve already seen jumped bigtime). Of equal interest is that at the same time, walks per plate appearance increased by about 10%. That’s pretty danged big.

As an aside, I think it’s interesting to see that HRs got better for pitchers (went down), but Ks and walk-rates got worse. I tend to buy the whole “pitching is getting worse” thing, but this suggests that the “issue” is not with pitcher movement, but with stuff and control. Also, however, given that we have so many hitters flowing into the league with very high contact (BABIP) ratings, I’m thinking the bigger issue is with the control rating.

And by “issue,” I don’t mean anything is particularly wrong, but that the rating may be seeing a dive in recent times. That said, I’ struggle with any one rating being the sole cause of a half a run a game jump in performance. The rat that this smells like is multi-dimensional.

For the fun of it, here are some stolen base numbers:

Stat20402041
SB%74.30%73.20%
SB/1B0.0150.017
I’m not sure I’m seeing anything in footspeed and steal rates that suggests it played in the league’s offensive burst.

How about fielding percentage:
Stat20402041
F%.983.983

Herein lies danger, though. Fielding percentage by the game has not changed appreciably, but fielding percentage is a horrible stat to measure defense by. All it basically says is that the error rate on registered chances has not changed appreciably.

I note that when I looked at fielding data from my game log, I found (as I recall off my head) that defense was getting to a percent or so fewer balls than they did last year. If that is true, the fact that we are fielding poorer defenses than we have in the past would also account for some of that twelve-point BABIP jump.


SO, WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?

Well, I dunno. Feel free to tell me what you think, but I think this is an “and” world rather than a “this world.” By that I mean that I think the bottom line on what is causing this big surge is a crossfire combination of pitcher demise, increase in superstar contact guys, poorer defenses, and a subtle increase in the existence of more offensive ballparks when it comes to doubles and triples. Some of this data bears that opinion out, some of it (the defensive stuff especially) it remains at least somewhat mum on.

I don’t know what to project for next year. I don’t know how hard or not hard the game’s development processes are at work in the paring down of pitchers—or whether it will revers shortly and work harder on offensive players. All I can say for sure is that the game environment is in flux, and (with a little frustration thrown in on a daily bases) I admit I think this is a “good” thing in that it makes it very hard to project what’s happening tomorrow.

This, after all, is why we play the game.
GM: Bikini Krill
Nothing Matters But the Pacific Pennant
Roster

jleddy
Ex-GM
Posts: 3216
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 5:46 pm
Location: Long Beach, CA
Has thanked: 3377 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: 2041: Offensive Explosion - A Look at Stat Rates

Post by jleddy » Fri Mar 06, 2020 1:49 pm

Interesting figures to chew on. Any chance of comparing league park factors from 2040 to 2041?

Also, Boise takes full responsibility in the drop in SB% this year.
"My $#!? doesn't work in the playoffs." - Billy Beane Joe Lederer

User avatar
shoeless.db
BBA GM
Posts: 2610
Joined: Wed May 29, 2019 10:25 pm
Has thanked: 2109 times
Been thanked: 1284 times

Re: 2041: Offensive Explosion - A Look at Stat Rates

Post by shoeless.db » Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:14 pm

jleddy wrote:
Fri Mar 06, 2020 1:49 pm
Also, Boise takes full responsibility in the drop in SB% this year.
Yeah, about that, good governor. Your guys do know where second base is when they're stealing right? I mean, did French just take off in any old direction and, subsequently, get called out for running out of the baseline every other attempt?
shoeless
-- Vic Caleca Team News Award Winner 2052
-- Sacramento Mad Popes 2039-2054
-- Mental Health Recharge 2055-2056
-- Sacramento Mad Popes 2057-2062
-- Cobble Hill Robins 2063-?
Life is a bit more beautiful when time is measured by the half inning rather than the half hour.

User avatar
Lane
GB: Vice Commissioner
Posts: 7509
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:18 am
Location: Los Angeles
Has thanked: 671 times
Been thanked: 963 times

Re: 2041: Offensive Explosion - A Look at Stat Rates

Post by Lane » Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:23 pm

shoeless.db wrote:
Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:14 pm
jleddy wrote:
Fri Mar 06, 2020 1:49 pm
Also, Boise takes full responsibility in the drop in SB% this year.
Yeah, about that, good governor. Your guys do know where second base is when they're stealing right? I mean, did French just take off in any old direction and, subsequently, get called out for running out of the baseline every other attempt?
*ahem*

Per the rules, a runner creates his own basepath. If Mr. French wishes to take an unusual route to second base, he's certainly allowed to.
Stephen Lane
Vice Commissioner / Historian
General Manager, Long Beach Surfers
Since 2026

Image


Ex-GM, Amsterdam Neptunes, 2025 EBA Champions

Link Generator Unified History Donate

User avatar
CTBrewCrew
GB: FL Heartland Division Director
Posts: 6399
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:20 am
Location: Milford, CT
Has thanked: 998 times
Been thanked: 1649 times

Re: 2041: Offensive Explosion - A Look at Stat Rates

Post by CTBrewCrew » Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:49 pm

jleddy wrote:
Fri Mar 06, 2020 1:49 pm
Interesting figures to chew on. Any chance of comparing league park factors from 2040 to 2041?

Also, Boise takes full responsibility in the drop in SB% this year.
I am working on a park factors one now....

BTW - for what its worth, this offensive explosion is totally related the the 15m Madison is paying Mons the past season!
Image

jleddy
Ex-GM
Posts: 3216
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 5:46 pm
Location: Long Beach, CA
Has thanked: 3377 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: 2041: Offensive Explosion - A Look at Stat Rates

Post by jleddy » Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:59 pm

You already met your Mons quota earlier today.
"My $#!? doesn't work in the playoffs." - Billy Beane Joe Lederer

User avatar
CTBrewCrew
GB: FL Heartland Division Director
Posts: 6399
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:20 am
Location: Milford, CT
Has thanked: 998 times
Been thanked: 1649 times

Re: 2041: Offensive Explosion - A Look at Stat Rates

Post by CTBrewCrew » Sat Mar 07, 2020 9:33 pm

jleddy wrote:
Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:59 pm
You already met your Mons quota earlier today.
Ha!
Image

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “League Features”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests