Absolutely the right call strictly because intent of the fielder is not relevant. I had the opposite case in American Legion ball when, playing 2B, I covered a steal with a man on 3rd. I tagged the stealer from 1st and he rolled over me while the guy from 3rd scored before being called out due to interference. Whether we would have caught both was irrelevant as long as I made an effort to get up and make the play.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Wow!! WS game won on defensive interference!
-
cheekimonk
- BBA GM
- Posts: 5342
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 6:46 pm
- Location: Birmingham, AL
- Has thanked: 160 times
- Been thanked: 131 times
- Contact:
Wow!! WS game won on defensive interference!
Ben Teague, GM Boise Spuds
2682-3175, .457 PCT (5,857 games, 36 seasons)
11 Playoff Appearances, 1 Championship
Former BBA GM: Many (Monty Brewster Memorial Series champion: 1997)
Former GBC GM: Jerusalem, Buenos Aires
Boise Home Page (roster, prospects, etc.)
2682-3175, .457 PCT (5,857 games, 36 seasons)
11 Playoff Appearances, 1 Championship
Former BBA GM: Many (Monty Brewster Memorial Series champion: 1997)
Former GBC GM: Jerusalem, Buenos Aires
Boise Home Page (roster, prospects, etc.)
Re: Wow!! WS game won on defensive interference!
Very strange way to end any game let alone the 3rd game of the world series, but totally the correct call.
Jason Martin
GM: California Crusaders, MBWBA
Twitter: MBWBA_Crusaders
GM: California Crusaders, MBWBA
Twitter: MBWBA_Crusaders
-
Al-Hoot
Re: Wow!! WS game won on defensive interference!
it was a h3ll of a lot more exciting than Gravity 3d, which I had just seen prior to the end of the game
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests