Rule 5 eligibility of tradees

Need the Commissioner to take care of something? Post here.
User avatar
chicoruiz
BBA GM
Posts: 635
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2020 2:32 pm
Has thanked: 188 times
Been thanked: 444 times

Rule 5 eligibility of tradees

Post by chicoruiz » Tue Aug 17, 2021 10:02 pm

Okay... I was going through the Rule 5 pool and saw the name of the shortstop, Setiawan Sumual, who I just acquired in my trade with Rockville. I thought, "that's odd... I didn't think he was rule 5 eligible", but I didn't want to lose him, so I moved him to my 40 man. Then I noticed that the two other young guys I got in the deal are also in the pool. So I looked at the rules again, to make sure I understood them, and I'm pretty sure none of them should be Rule 5 eligible:

Setiawan Sumual- age 21, just drafted last year

Kelyn Lomond, age 21- two professional seasons

Hilarius Stohl- age 21- three professional seasons

It's very possible that I don't understand the eligibility rules correctly, and if that's the case I apologize for taking up your time, but I can't give up three 40-man spots if I don't have to, especially in the situation El Paso is in, talent-wise. If it turns out that Sumual doesn't need to be on the 40, is there a way to remove him without exposing him to waivers? If not, I'll just suck it up and take my medicine...

Thanks in advance...
( “In baseball you don’t know nothin’...” Yogi Berra)

User avatar
Rubaboo
BBA GM
Posts: 2194
Joined: Tue May 27, 2014 9:09 pm
Location: Chippewa Falls, WI
Has thanked: 201 times
Been thanked: 326 times

Re: Rule 5 eligibility of tradees

Post by Rubaboo » Wed Aug 18, 2021 9:55 am

I'll take a stab at this -

Lomond was a scouting find in 2042. My understanding is that their clocks start as soon as they hit the international complex so he might actually be eligible.

The other guys? They don't seem like they should be eligible. However, the all have in their player history that they were released by Rockville. Not sure if something funky happened when the trade was submitted in game or anything but if they got put back in your system as minor league signees the game would think they're eligible because free agents that get signed to minor league deals are eligible right away.

Not sure if any of this is helpful or correct but my best guess is that something happened before the trade was executed on Rockville's side. Hopefully it can all get resolved for you.
Fred Holmes
General Manager
Mexico City Aztecs - BBA

BBA Champs - 2052
JL Champs - 2027, 2052
JL MW Champs - 2022, 2023, 2024, 2027
JL Sun Belt Champs - 2035, 2036, 2038
JL Frontier Champs - 2051, 2052
JL Manager of the Year - 2023, 2024, 2026, 2052

Fat Nige
Ex-GM
Posts: 3982
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 3:50 pm
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire, ENGLAND
Has thanked: 586 times
Been thanked: 456 times

Re: Rule 5 eligibility of tradees

Post by Fat Nige » Wed Aug 18, 2021 11:32 am

I got stung like that a few times, players not coming back from the old Florida Prospect League we used to have. Once Matt had rounded them up, they were of course showing R5 eligible because they had become free agent signees.
Nigel Laverick
(former GM of El Paso Chilis #WeWereShitty) ,
Now GM Riyadh Red Crescents #WeBeNotSoNewNow #WeAreJustAsShitty


Riyadh GM since May 2046

JL Manager of the Year 2000 (Baltimore Monarchs)
Nothing since


An MBBA GM since 1995 (off & on)

usnspecialist
Ex-GM
Posts: 6652
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:39 am
Location: Manama, Bahrain
Has thanked: 207 times
Been thanked: 776 times

Re: Rule 5 eligibility of tradees

Post by usnspecialist » Wed Aug 18, 2021 12:28 pm

Rubaboo wrote:
Wed Aug 18, 2021 9:55 am
I'll take a stab at this -

Lomond was a scouting find in 2042. My understanding is that their clocks start as soon as they hit the international complex so he might actually be eligible.

The other guys? They don't seem like they should be eligible. However, the all have in their player history that they were released by Rockville. Not sure if something funky happened when the trade was submitted in game or anything but if they got put back in your system as minor league signees the game would think they're eligible because free agents that get signed to minor league deals are eligible right away.

Not sure if any of this is helpful or correct but my best guess is that something happened before the trade was executed on Rockville's side. Hopefully it can all get resolved for you.
I'm pretty sure fred is right with the minor league FA piece. Let recte know via ping commish and he can take care of it.
Randy Weigand

Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-

League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43

Image

User avatar
chicoruiz
BBA GM
Posts: 635
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2020 2:32 pm
Has thanked: 188 times
Been thanked: 444 times

Re: Rule 5 eligibility of tradees

Post by chicoruiz » Wed Aug 18, 2021 12:49 pm

Okay, that makes sense... So I went ahead and moved Lomond to my 40-man. That puts me at 39. I'll submit a two-round Rule 5 draft list. If the commish can remove Sumual before the the draft, I'll get to make two picks; if not, I won't bitch about it. If the easiest course of action is for me to just waive Sumual and have you instruct everyone not to claim him, I'll do that; I won't submit the file till I have instructions from you.

Thanks everyone for your help and explanations...
( “In baseball you don’t know nothin’...” Yogi Berra)

User avatar
aaronweiner
BBA GM
Posts: 12055
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:56 pm
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 776 times

Re: Rule 5 eligibility of tradees

Post by aaronweiner » Wed Aug 18, 2021 2:08 pm

Matt will take care of this. This trade wasn't meant to be anywhere near this complicated - OOTP had other ideas.

User avatar
chicoruiz
BBA GM
Posts: 635
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2020 2:32 pm
Has thanked: 188 times
Been thanked: 444 times

Re: Rule 5 eligibility of tradees

Post by chicoruiz » Thu Aug 19, 2021 2:33 pm

Bottom line: I waived another guy, so I'm at 38 and can make 2 rule 5 picks, which is all I want. Lomond and Sumual are on the 40, so they're cool. I'm holding the line on Stohl not needing to be on the 40, so if someone picks him in the draft I may have to pitch a minor hissy fit :)...

Still don't understand why the three prospects I got in the Rockville trade have caused so much grief, but whatever...
( “In baseball you don’t know nothin’...” Yogi Berra)

User avatar
recte44
GB: Commissioner
Posts: 43211
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:14 pm
Location: Oconomowoc, WI
Has thanked: 143 times
Been thanked: 1649 times
Contact:

Re: Rule 5 eligibility of tradees

Post by recte44 » Thu Aug 19, 2021 7:30 pm

:plus1:

Locked Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Ping: Commish”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests