Input Requested: Rating Scale

Ted · Post by **Ted** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:42 pm

RonCo wrote: ↑
Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:37 pm
Yeah, I suspect we would keep the individual skills where they are. On the other hand, the purpose of this tread is to open any conversations folks want to have ... so ...

Dang it, Ron, you're killing me. Which ratings set is the poll question asking about?

Post by **RonCo** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:44 pm

Ted wrote: ↑
Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:42 pm

RonCo wrote: ↑
Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:37 pm
Yeah, I suspect we would keep the individual skills where they are. On the other hand, the purpose of this tread is to open any conversations folks want to have ... so ...
Dang it, Ron, you're killing me. Which ratings set is the poll question asking about?

Let's interpret it today as "overall" and as I said after you posted this one, maybe I'll try one that's a bit better worded in a few days. Plenty of time to let things simmer

niles08 · Post by **niles08** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:56 pm

Darn, I thought this was regarding individual ratings. I say we make them the same...both overall/potential and individual ratings such as con/pow/eye at 2-8.

While we're at it "hide" the overall rating and just leave the potential but leave the individual ratings showing both ovr & pot.

Post by **RonCo** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:57 pm

I should note that I'm 99% sure that the extended scale in v21 is only applicable to Power and Stuff. All others have always been able to past 10 and up to 13 (and still can), but stuff and power plays on a different scale.

Post by **Lane** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 3:10 pm

Ah, so that changes my vote. Really this is not a big deal to me at the end of the day though.

sjshaw · Post by **sjshaw** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 3:11 pm

Oh, I thought this was talking about CON/STU/etc., not OVR/POT. I don't care about the latter. The former should have as much fog of war as possible.

lordtoffee · Post by **lordtoffee** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 4:30 pm

I voted for the 20-80, as that is what I personally use in all the solo stuff I do. Plus it just feels more real life to me.

YouTube · Post by **recte44** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 4:32 pm

I wouldn’t be for changing anything here. Am for getting rid of relative ratings though.

jiminyhopkins · Post by **jiminyhopkins** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:12 pm

I'm not voting for anything until someone explains exactly what we are voting for and why. Especially why.

Seems like every time someone gets a burr up their ass, we change something. Sheesh.

Post by **RonCo** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:20 pm

jiminyhopkins wrote: ↑
Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:12 pm
I'm not voting for anything until someone explains exactly what we are voting for and why. Especially why.

Seems like every time someone gets a burr up their ass, we change something. Sheesh.

I apologize for my wishy-washy wording on this one. I think the relative rating thing is more clear. That said, we're looking for general input here more than any kind of binding vote.

Post by **RonCo** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:22 pm

What I think this response says is that there isn't a lot of passion to change the fundamental rating structure, but I will do one more poll tonight that will hopefully capture that better.

Post by **RonCo** » Thu Sep 10, 2020 5:55 pm

Locking this topic due to second version of the poll.

The Brewster

The Brewster

Input Requested: Rating Scale

Which rating scale should we use for 2045?

Re: Input Requested: Rating Scale

Re: Input Requested: Rating Scale

Re: Input Requested: Rating Scale

Re: Input Requested: Rating Scale

Re: Input Requested: Rating Scale

Re: Input Requested: Rating Scale

Re: Input Requested: Rating Scale

Re: Input Requested: Rating Scale

Re: Input Requested: Rating Scale

Re: Input Requested: Rating Scale

Re: Input Requested: Rating Scale

Re: Input Requested: Rating Scale

Who is online