Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Analyze and breakdown all Brewster Baseball Association deals here
User avatar
RonCo
GB: JL Frontier Division Director
Posts: 19951
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
Has thanked: 2003 times
Been thanked: 2965 times

Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Post by RonCo » Thu Sep 17, 2020 1:31 pm

Image
Image











Two seasons ago Ben Heuring inherited a division winning team in Brooklyn. He proceeded to show that even as a rookie GM he understood that Robin fans deserved the best, and that he wasn't afraid to pull the big levers. He signed free agents. He made deals. Unfortunately, even the best laid plans can run afoul of the fates. The Brooklyn Robins finished 2044 15 1/2 games behind the division winning Jimmies of Charm City.

As 2044 rose in the east league pundits saw the team fading even further, with the media guide projecting a losing season. The team's performance in April, however, suggested just what the pundits could do what with those projections. The team was 18 wins over 12 losses, and sitting in the middle of what promises to be a real gunfight in the Atlantic division this year, as news came today of the trade that the young and talented Mr. Heuring had pulled the trigger on.

On the other side of the United States sat the Shoeless Wonder, GM of the Sacramento Mad Popes, a team that had been getting old at the seams for some time and whose threads had maybe burst with the leavings of three of the better pitchers in franchise history. At 10 wins and 20 losses, the storied baseball club was reassessing it’s situation, and coming up, well, not so rosy.

As these kinds of stories always go, these two managed to bump into each other one dark and stormy night and over a couple glasses of bourbon hashed out a deal that will set the courses of their teams for the next five or so seasons.

It breaks down like this:

The Robins—whose offense had been flagging—picked up three pieces that fill the roster with guys who can play now. The Mad Popes turned those pieces into three shiny bits of future.

Image
Brooklyn’s haul:


2B Edgardo Encarnacion
3B/SS Jorge Lugo
1B Rafael Mota


Focusing on the present, the Robins got considerably better up the middle with this deal. Yes, they had Ronald Drouin at second base, and solid defensive man Dick Walton at short, but at 21 Walton already has an unhappy injury history and he’s not really wowed anyone with the bat in his three seasons. Drouin is a solid left bat, but really, really needs a platoon partner. Encarnacion and Lugo fit these needs about as well as you could prescribe. And don’t be too surprised to see Lugo slide to the hot corner, where neither Nico Eijpe nor Ingacio Venegas are the guys any fan of any playoff team really want patrolling.

The only real downgrade here is the swap of Cruz for Mota, but Mota can hit lefthanded pitching. Someone had to go to make room for salary, and with LHB Art O’Bryan already established at first base from the left side of the plate, it makes some sense that Cruz—who is 35 and hasn’t had a 2-WAR years since 2041—would be the guy.

Focusing on the future, Encarnacion is 25, but looking to get paid in Free Agency. Lugo at 23 still has a couple season of team control. Mota is a bit of a wild card—a solid enough player, but also the kind of guy lots of teams have a few of. Then there’s the albatross in the room—that $24M that is still owed a now 35 year old Cruz as he begins his fade. The deal helps here because it frees up cap space that could be used to possibly keep Encarnacion around, or for whatever other purpose is there.


Overall Assessment For Brooklyn:

Both are solid baseball players who have post season experience, which is obviously what this deal was designed to do for Brooklyn. The team is built for now and the next few seasons. By adding both Encarnacion and Lugo, GM Ben Heuring fills the team with guys who can play, and perhaps even more valuably, removes two players from the roster who would be less reliable. One assumes Miguel Santana (a replacement level player) will be optioned, and that either Eijpe or Venegas will be on the bus with him.

Some might question whether the club gave too much future, but we’ll get to that in a moment. A deep team is a winning team, and the Robins have opportunity now. So the deal makes sense.

Anyway, to me this deal is going to highlight the vision of Ben Heuring. Was he right in the assessment that the iron was hot now—that the Atlantic Division scrum was there for the taking. Victory goes to the bold, after all. Or at least that’s how the history books write it when you win. If this works out, Brooklyn will be a post season team, and possibly one that takes a bye as the division champion. If it doesn’t, well … the Robins should still be fine for the near future, anyway. It’s a solid team with an established superstar in the works in Sawyer Slizz.

Sit down and buckle up, though. Ben saw his hole, and he’s running his team through it.

It’s going to be fun to watch.

Image Sacramento’s Haul:

1B Fernando Cruz
3B Luis Lucero
P Raj Mahadevan
P John Scovell
OF Jiao-long Ma

Lucero is presumably a throw in to make positions work for Sacramento somehow. I can’t see it any other way. Same for Cruz and the salary thing with the exception that assuming he rights the ship today, Cruz could be flipped for another piece of future, though it might cost some cash or cap space to do it. Given the Mad Popes are now officially bailing water from the lifeboat, I assume that’s going to happen—something that means this assessment is almost certainly incomplete.

That said, Cruz is the kind of guy who could well suddenly get hot and carry a team for a month, so there’s actually some chance the Popes do well this year, too. I’m not thinking that will happen, but you know, there’s a chance.

The real question for the Popes, though, is what these three kids will do. It’s a bit of a dangerous mix. Two kids in short A, and another in Rookie ball.

Mahadevan is listed as the #65 prospect in the BBA. I assume this is on the strength of that “11” knuckleball, which may be fair, I guess. Otherwise, I admit I don’t really see that in his 7/6/6 ratings or his minor league performance to date. At eighteen years old, you just don’t know. But he walked 66 guys in 46 innings, striking out only 12. Someone’s going to have to net that butterfly sometime. Scovell, also eighteen, is more interesting to me, but is not ranked in the top prospect lists. He also projects as a reliever—and perhaps one of those super-use relievers everyone is so fancy on right now. Overall, I like him. Ma is an interesting looking prospect with pop in his bat, which swings from the left side. All that’s good, but the word is that he’s going to need to improve the defense in order to play center field in the big leagues. He’s seventeen, though, it could happen.


Overall Assessment For Sacramento:


When you’re on the “Later” side of a “Now for Later” deal, it’s always filled with concern. Those kids need to pan out, right? Even if Cruz manages to win the Mad Popes a few games in 2044, he’ll likely be gone soon. This is all about development, and all about how you see uncertainty. It’s also about the question of whether the GM could have gotten more for their established players, and whether the deal fit some kind of plan.

In this case, the club traded two solid players under 25 years old, one with team control, and a journeyman first baseman. Could they have gotten more? Probably not, though no one but shoeless’s wine-besotted wife knows the extent of discussions surrounding those players. Given their ages and overall profiles, projecting these guys is hard. They could all three hit, and carry Sacramento to future titles, and they could just as well be expected to blow up and leave shoeless empty handed.

When you put this deal together with two others made over the past few days, the Pope’s mad plan seems fairly obvious, though—run the classic fire sale of cutting bait on anything of value now and push your capital into young guys in hope most pan out.

Give that, this is mission accomplished. Pope fans may not like it, but they’ll just have to deal with it. And maybe, just maybe, given the window of these players, the sun will come out again in or around 2047 or 2048?
GM: Bikini Krill
Nothing Matters But the Pacific Pennant
Roster

User avatar
RonCo
GB: JL Frontier Division Director
Posts: 19951
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
Has thanked: 2003 times
Been thanked: 2965 times

Re: Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Post by RonCo » Thu Sep 17, 2020 1:50 pm

Lovers? Levers? :shrug:
GM: Bikini Krill
Nothing Matters But the Pacific Pennant
Roster

jleddy
Ex-GM
Posts: 3216
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 5:46 pm
Location: Long Beach, CA
Has thanked: 3377 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Post by jleddy » Thu Sep 17, 2020 1:55 pm

RonCo wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2020 1:50 pm
Lovers? Levers? :shrug:
What two GMs do behind closed doors to, um, consummate a deal is none of our damn business.
"My $#!? doesn't work in the playoffs." - Billy Beane Joe Lederer

User avatar
RonCo
GB: JL Frontier Division Director
Posts: 19951
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
Has thanked: 2003 times
Been thanked: 2965 times

Re: Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Post by RonCo » Thu Sep 17, 2020 1:56 pm

At least they didn't include Wang in the deal.
GM: Bikini Krill
Nothing Matters But the Pacific Pennant
Roster

User avatar
lordtoffee
BBA GM
Posts: 678
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 8:23 am
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 235 times

Re: Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Post by lordtoffee » Thu Sep 17, 2020 2:05 pm

Very good analysis Ron. I'll go into more detail on the next TN I write, but this trade does a couple of things for me. One, my offense improves and the infield gets better. More importantly, I get rid of a couple of contracts and gives me the flexibility to sign Slizz long term in the future and I have cap room even if Philips and Legrand opt to not test free agency with their options. I think that getting a better infield tied with Luna playing an Andrew Miller type role in the bullpen gives me the best chance to battle for a playoff spot. If the prospects do pan out, they are out of the Johnson.
Chief Baseball Officer- Brooklyn Robins

The Rebuilding Will Continue Until the Robins improve.

User avatar
shoeless.db
BBA GM
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed May 29, 2019 10:25 pm
Has thanked: 1845 times
Been thanked: 1100 times

Re: Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Post by shoeless.db » Thu Sep 17, 2020 2:07 pm

Very well done. You're pretty much spot on in your assessment. Encarnacion was not going to be a Pope next year due to his demands (roughly 9-10 per season), and Lugo was just a solid chip to try to land some prospects due to having middle infielders Kramer and Charriere on my roster. Lugo is arguably the most talented of the three overall, but he's the oldest too, so I started looking at who would be cheaper and still fully contributing in two to three years.

With most organizations having barren farm systems, I feel like it's a good idea to grab as much of the little potential cream out there.

Best of luck to Ben on his run this season.
Sacramento Mad Popes
-- Vic Caleca Team News Award Winner 2052
-- BBA Champion 2053
— The Heartland Sucks
-- Pacific Champs 2040, 2042, 2043, 2047, 2048, 2049, 2051, 2053, 2054, 2058
Life is a bit more beautiful when time is measured by the half inning rather than the half hour.

User avatar
RonCo
GB: JL Frontier Division Director
Posts: 19951
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
Has thanked: 2003 times
Been thanked: 2965 times

Re: Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Post by RonCo » Thu Sep 17, 2020 2:08 pm

Moving $8M of possibly degrading cap space off your roster is pretty much always something a contending team has to consider a positive.
GM: Bikini Krill
Nothing Matters But the Pacific Pennant
Roster

User avatar
HoosierVic
Ex-GM
Posts: 3106
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2019 9:16 pm
Has thanked: 472 times
Been thanked: 1020 times

Re: Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Post by HoosierVic » Thu Sep 17, 2020 2:19 pm

I’m not entirely sure it was Shoeless’s wife who was wine-besotted ... we kid. We kid because we love.

Interesting deal on both ends. I agree with Doug’s assessment that as we’ve moved away from those super draft classes of the late 30s, the talent pool in the minors has stretched thinner and thinner. In his situation, with an aging team losing talent, it made sense to target prospects who could bear fruit in a few years. It’s a gamble, sure, but what isn’t?

In the space of a few days, Sacramento has essentially remade its farm system. It will be fascinating now to see what happens.

Gutsy moves.

User avatar
CTBrewCrew
GB: FL Heartland Division Director
Posts: 5167
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:20 am
Location: Milford, CT
Has thanked: 924 times
Been thanked: 1334 times

Re: Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Post by CTBrewCrew » Thu Sep 17, 2020 4:00 pm

Shoeless and the wife discuss “Popes” players over some vino? 😜
Image

User avatar
shoeless.db
BBA GM
Posts: 2340
Joined: Wed May 29, 2019 10:25 pm
Has thanked: 1845 times
Been thanked: 1100 times

Re: Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Post by shoeless.db » Thu Sep 17, 2020 5:45 pm

I take solace in the fact that regardless of the trades I make, none will be as bad as the Don Smith trade.

Sorry, Marko.
Sacramento Mad Popes
-- Vic Caleca Team News Award Winner 2052
-- BBA Champion 2053
— The Heartland Sucks
-- Pacific Champs 2040, 2042, 2043, 2047, 2048, 2049, 2051, 2053, 2054, 2058
Life is a bit more beautiful when time is measured by the half inning rather than the half hour.

User avatar
lordtoffee
BBA GM
Posts: 678
Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2019 8:23 am
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 235 times

Re: Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Post by lordtoffee » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:58 pm

shoeless.db wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2020 5:45 pm
I take solace in the fact that regardless of the trades I make, none will be as bad as the Don Smith trade.

Sorry, Marko.
That might be a league feature at some point.
Chief Baseball Officer- Brooklyn Robins

The Rebuilding Will Continue Until the Robins improve.

User avatar
CTBrewCrew
GB: FL Heartland Division Director
Posts: 5167
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:20 am
Location: Milford, CT
Has thanked: 924 times
Been thanked: 1334 times

Re: Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Post by CTBrewCrew » Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:43 pm

shoeless.db wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2020 5:45 pm
I take solace in the fact that regardless of the trades I make, none will be as bad as the Don Smith trade.

Sorry, Marko.
ooooo Jimmys down!!!!
Image

User avatar
jiminyhopkins
BBA GM
Posts: 3508
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 2:33 pm
Location: OH
Has thanked: 302 times
Been thanked: 926 times

Re: Trade Analysis: Brooklyn/Sacramento

Post by jiminyhopkins » Thu Sep 17, 2020 7:47 pm

lordtoffee wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:58 pm
shoeless.db wrote:
Thu Sep 17, 2020 5:45 pm
I take solace in the fact that regardless of the trades I make, none will be as bad as the Don Smith trade.

Sorry, Marko.
That might be a league feature at some point.
Hey, I called it first.
GM, 2051, 2053, and 2058 JL WILDCARD Phoenix Talons (2029-??), BBA
CARETAKER GM, 2053 GBC CHAMPION Tokyo Pearls (2053 - 2058)
GM, THE GREATEST MINOR LEAGUE TEAM OF ALL TIME Toledo Liberty
Vic Caleca Team News Award Winner: 2051, 2054, 2057

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “Trade Analysis”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests