Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 6652
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: Manama, Bahrain
- Has thanked: 207 times
- Been thanked: 776 times
Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
So inspired by a seemingly rhetorical question tossed out in Episode 62 of the Ted and Ron Show (also known as the BBA Today), I decided to take a look at whether it is better to have an elite pitching staff or offense in the playoffs. I looked at this a few different ways which will be broken down in subsequent posts, but first some housekeeping items.
-To compare I used runs scored and runs allowed, as those are the simplest metrics
-Park factors are NOT accounted for. I know this is a big determinant but there is no real easy way to go back into history and not only figure out park factors, but also how they compare to the rest of the league
-This data is from 1995-2043.
-Teams are ranked by their Z-Score (basically how dominant they were in comparison to their peers in the same year, to allow us to judge across eras)
-I ignored any difference in leagues, although I do have that data available where I could break down if necessary.
-To compare I used runs scored and runs allowed, as those are the simplest metrics
-Park factors are NOT accounted for. I know this is a big determinant but there is no real easy way to go back into history and not only figure out park factors, but also how they compare to the rest of the league
-This data is from 1995-2043.
-Teams are ranked by their Z-Score (basically how dominant they were in comparison to their peers in the same year, to allow us to judge across eras)
-I ignored any difference in leagues, although I do have that data available where I could break down if necessary.
Randy Weigand
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 6652
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: Manama, Bahrain
- Has thanked: 207 times
- Been thanked: 776 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
HITTING:
PLACE | TEAM | YEAR | PLAYOFF RESULT |
---|---|---|---|
1. | SAN FERNANDO | 2037 | Lost Landis |
2. | HUNTSVILLE (CHI) | 2026 | Lost Cartwright |
3. | MONTREAL | 2003 | None |
4. | LONG BEACH | 2011 | Lost Cartwright |
5. | HALIFAX (NSH) | 2020 | Lost Landis |
6. | BIRMINGHAM (SA) | 2015 | Won Landis |
7. | LAS VEGAS | 2031 | Lost Cartwright |
8. | LAS VEGAS | 2028 | Lost Cartwright |
9. | MONTREAL | 2032 | Lost Geoghegan |
10. | LONG BEACH | 2012 | Lost Cartwright |
11. | LONG BEACH | 2009 | Lost Cartwright |
12. | MONTREAL | 2002 | Lost Doubleday |
13. | NEW ORLEANS | 2004 | Lost Landis |
14. | SAN FERNANDO | 2039 | Lost Doubleday |
15. | LAS VEGAS | 2033 | Lost Doubleday |
16. | BALTIMORE (BRK) | 2007 | None |
17. | JACKSONVILLE | 2034 | Lost Doubleday |
18. | CALGARY | 2016 | Lost Doubleday |
19. | ROCKVILLE | 2038 | Lost Cartwright |
20. | MADISON | 2005 | Lost Doubleday |
21. | LOUISVILLE | 2042 | Won Landis |
22. | CAROLINA (RCK) | 2017 | Lost Landis |
23. | JACKSONVILLE | 2036 | Lost Doubleday |
24. | SEATTLE | 2013 | Lost Landis |
25. | LAS VEGAS | 2030 | Lost Landis |
26. | LOUISVILLE | 1996 | Lost Cartwright |
27. | NEW ORLEANS | 2013 | Lost Cartwright |
28. | ATLANTIC CITY | 2028 | Lost Doubleday |
29. | INDIANAPOLIS (OMA) | 2023 | Lost Landis |
30. | SEATTLE | 2012 | Lost Doubleday |
31. | INDIANAPOLIS (OMA) | 2025 | None |
32. | BIRMINGHAM (SA) | 2016 | Lost Doubleday |
33. | LONG BEACH | 2010 | Lost Doubleday |
34. | BALTIMORE (BRK) | 2001 | Lost Doubleday |
35. | JACKSONVILLE | 2038 | Lost Doubleday |
36. | YELLOW SPRINGS | 2038 | Lost Doubleday |
37. | LOUISVILLE | 2030 | Won Landis |
38. | MONTREAL | 2031 | Lost Doubleday |
39. | LAS VEGAS | 2027 | Won Landis |
40. | MADISON | 2004 | Won Landis |
41. | SEATTLE | 2015 | Lost Doubleday |
42. | LAS VEGAS | 2018 | Lost Cartwright |
43. | SAN FERNANDO | 2043 | Lost Geoghegan |
44. | MONTREAL | 2019 | Lost Doubleday |
45. | MADISON | 1998 | Lost Cartwright |
46. | SAN FERNANDO | 2035 | Lost Doubleday |
47. | BOISE | 2041 | None |
48. | MONTREAL | 2014 | Lost Doubleday |
49. | LONG BEACH | 2006 | Lost Cartwright |
50. | MONTREAL | 2013 | Lost Doubleday |
51. | HALIFAX (NSH) | 2018 | Lost Landis |
52. | BALTIMORE (BRK) | 2008 | Lost Cartwright |
53. | BALTIMORE (BRK) | 2000 | Lost Doubleday |
54. | CALGARY | 2000 | Lost Doubleday |
55. | LOUISVILLE | 1997 | None |
56. | ATLANTIC CITY | 2024 | Lost Landis |
57. | YELLOW SPRINGS | 2041 | Lost Landis |
58. | SEATTLE | 2010 | None |
59. | MADISON | 1999 | Lost Cartwright |
60. | LONG BEACH | 2029 | Won Landis |
61. | TWIN CITIES | 2042 | Lost Geoghegan |
62. | SEATTLE | 2016 | None |
63. | MADISON | 2002 | Lost Doubleday |
64. | LONG BEACH | 2007 | Lost Doubleday |
65. | HUNTSVILLE (CHI) | 2025 | Lost Cartwright |
66. | SEATTLE | 2024 | Lost Cartwright |
67. | HAWAII | 2043 | Lost Doubleday |
68. | SEATTLE | 2027 | None |
69. | MONTREAL | 2022 | None |
70. | SEATTLE | 2022 | Lost Doubleday |
71. | GREENVILLE (JAX) | 1997 | Lost Cartwright |
72. | LAS VEGAS | 2009 | Lost Landis |
73. | MONTREAL | 2020 | Lost Doubleday |
74. | CALGARY | 2035 | Lost Cartwright |
75. | BALTIMORE (BRK) | 2002 | Lost Cartwright |
76. | BALTIMORE (BRK) | 1997 | Lost Landis |
77. | LOUISVILLE | 2040 | Lost Landis |
78. | HUNTSVILLE (CHI) | 2029 | Lost Doubleday |
79. | BALTIMORE (BRK) | 2003 | Lost Doubleday |
80. | MADISON | 2007 | Lost Cartwright |
81. | BROOKLYN | 2022 | Lost Landis |
82. | YELLOW SPRINGS | 2040 | Lost Cartwright |
83. | YELLOW SPRINGS | 2043 | Lost Cartwright |
84. | EDMONTON | 2041 | Won Landis |
85. | YELLOW SPRINGS | 2033 | Lost Landis |
86. | LAS VEGAS | 2026 | Lost Doubleday |
87. | OMAHA (MEX) | 2024 | Lost Cartwright |
88. | BROOKLYN | 2027 | Lost Doubleday |
89. | LOUISVILLE | 2018 | Lost Cartwright |
90. | CALGARY | 2019 | Lost Cartwright |
91. | ATLANTIC CITY | 2010 | Lost Landis |
92. | CALGARY | 2027 | Lost Doubleday |
93. | BALTIMORE (BRK) | 2005 | Lost Landis |
94. | CHICAGO | 1995 | Won Landis |
95. | HALIFAX (NSH) | 2021 | None |
96. | SEATTLE | 2019 | None |
97. | TWIN CITIES | 2033 | Lost Doubleday |
98. | LONG BEACH | 2008 | Lost Doubleday |
99. | YELLOW SPRINGS | 2042 | Lost Doubleday |
100. | MARQUETTE (OMA) | 2001 | Lost Cartwright |
Randy Weigand
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 6652
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: Manama, Bahrain
- Has thanked: 207 times
- Been thanked: 776 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
PITCHING:
PLACE | TEAM | YEAR | PLAYOFF RESULT |
---|---|---|---|
1. | California | 2037 | Lost Doubleday |
2. | EDMONTON | 2040 | Lost Cartwright |
3. | HACKENSACK | 1997 | Won Landis |
4. | HACKENSACK | 1996 | Lost Cartwright |
5. | VALENCIA | 1995 | Lost Cartwright |
6. | LAS VEGAS | 2006 | Won Landis |
7. | CALIFORNIA | 2036 | Lost Doubleday |
8. | MADISON | 2004 | Won Landis |
9. | CHICAGO | 2012 | Lost Doubleday |
10. | CALIFORNIA | 2035 | Won Landis |
11. | NEW ORLEANS | 2013 | Lost Cartwright |
12. | LAS VEGAS | 2008 | Won Landis |
13. | CALIFORNIA | 2014 | Lost Cartwright |
14. | CALIFORNIA | 2024 | Won Landis |
15. | HAWAII | 2007 | Lost Doubleday |
16. | CALGARY | 2041 | Lost Cartwright |
17. | CALIFORNIA | 2016 | Lost Landis |
18. | VANCOUVER | 2031 | Lost Geoghegan |
19. | CALIFORNIA | 1999 | Lost Doubleday |
20. | VALENCIA | 1996 | Lost Doubleday |
21. | CALIFORNIA | 2003 | Lost Landis |
22. | Rockville | 2037 | Won Landis |
23. | VANCOUVER | 2005 | Lost Doubleday |
24. | HAWAII | 2010 | Won Landis |
25. | CALIFORNIA | 2002 | Won Landis |
26. | CHICAGO | 2013 | Lost Cartwright |
27. | CALIFORNIA | 2015 | Lost Doubleday |
28. | CALIFORNIA | 2023 | Lost Geoghegan |
29. | SACRAMENTO | 2043 | Lost Doubleday |
30. | CALIFORNIA | 2032 | Lost Doubleday |
31. | CALIFORNIA | 2034 | Lost Geoghegan |
32. | HAVANA | 2034 | Won Landis |
33. | YELLOW SPRINGS | 2031 | Lost Landis |
34. | HAWAII | 2008 | Lost Doubleday |
35. | SAN ANTONIO | 2032 | Lost Geoghegan |
36. | Edmonton | 2037 | Lost Cartwright |
37. | CALIFORNIA | 2033 | Lost Doubleday |
38. | VANCOUVER | 2028 | Lost Doubleday |
39. | VANCOUVER | 2008 | Lost Landis |
40. | VANCOUVER | 2009 | Lost Cartwright |
41. | MEXICO CITY | 2035 | Lost Doubleday |
42. | VANCOUVER | 2029 | None |
43. | CHICAGO | 2015 | Lost Doubleday |
44. | CALIFORNIA | 2018 | None |
45. | SEATTLE | 2036 | Lost Geoghegan |
46. | CALIFORNIA | 2026 | None |
47. | CHICAGO | 2011 | Lost Doubleday |
48. | LAS VEGAS | 1997 | Lost Doubleday |
49. | YELLOW SPRINGS | 2043 | Lost Cartwright |
50. | YELLOW SPRINGS | 2018 | Lost Doubleday |
51. | ROCKVILLE | 2039 | Lost Cartwright |
52. | LOUISVILLE | 2031 | Lost Doubleday |
53. | CALIFORNIA | 2028 | Lost Geoghegan |
54. | CALIFORNIA | 2039 | Lost Geoghegan |
55. | EDMONTON | 2043 | Lost Geoghegan |
56. | YELLOW SPRINGS | 2042 | Lost Doubleday |
57. | OMAHA | 2026 | Lost Doubleday |
58. | HUNTSVILLE | 2029 | Lost Doubleday |
59. | CALIFORNIA | 2001 | None |
60. | OMAHA | 2023 | Lost Doubleday |
61. | LAS VEGAS | 2020 | Lost Cartwright |
62. | MADISON | 2001 | Lost Landis |
63. | HACKENSACK | 1995 | Lost Doubleday |
64. | CALIFORNIA | 1998 | None |
65. | LAS VEGAS | 2018 | Lost Cartwright |
66. | CALIFORNIA | 2025 | Lost Doubleday |
67. | HUNTSVILLE | 2025 | Lost Cartwright |
68. | NEW ORLEANS | 2020 | Lost Doubleday |
69. | HAWAII | 2006 | Lost Cartwright |
70. | VANCOUVER | 1999 | Won Landis |
71. | VANCOUVER | 2030 | Lost Geoghegan |
72. | MONTREAL | 2027 | Lost Cartwright |
73. | DES MOINES | 2005 | Lost Doubleday |
74. | MEXICO CITY | 2039 | Lost Geoghegan |
75. | LOUISVILLE | 2030 | Won Landis |
76. | CALIFORNIA | 2012 | None |
77. | HAWAII | 2009 | Lost Doubleday |
78. | CALGARY | 2000 | Lost Doubleday |
79. | LAS VEGAS | 2040 | Won Landis |
80. | YELLOW SPRINGS | 2041 | Lost Landis |
81. | CALIFORNIA | 2019 | None |
82. | VANCOUVER | 2027 | Lost Cartwright |
83. | MADISON | 2000 | Lost Cartwright |
84. | LAS VEGAS | 2005 | Won Landis |
85. | MONTREAL | 2011 | Won Landis |
86. | LAS VEGAS | 2041 | Lost Geoghegan |
87. | VALENCIA | 1998 | Lost Doubleday |
88. | MADISON | 1998 | Lost Cartwright |
89. | MARQUETTE | 2011 | Lost Doubleday |
90. | VANCOUVER | 2026 | None |
91. | MEXICO CITY | 2036 | Lost Geoghegan |
92. | CHICAGO | 2040 | None |
93. | LOUISVILLE | 2019 | Lost Doubleday |
94. | VANCOUVER | 2020 | None |
95. | CALIFORNIA | 2041 | Lost Geoghegan |
96. | MARQUETTE | 2001 | Lost Cartwright |
97. | VALENCIA | 1997 | Lost Doubleday |
98. | LOUISVILLE | 2042 | Won Landis |
99. | HUNTSVILLE | 2024 | Lost Doubleday |
99. | OMAHA | 2024 | Lost Cartwright |
Randy Weigand
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 6652
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: Manama, Bahrain
- Has thanked: 207 times
- Been thanked: 776 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
Below is a breakdown of the teams ranked in the respective hitting and pitching categories above in terms of what their playoff results were. The breakdown is Hitting/Pitching (so for example 1 team ranked in the top 10 hitting won the Landis, whereas 4 teams in the top 10 pitching did). It is worth noting that the Geoghegan round was not contested until 2021.
Top 10:
Won Landis : 1/4
Lost Landis : 2/0
Lost Cartwright : 5/3
Lost Doubleday : 0/3
Lost Geoghegan : 1/0
None : 1/0
Top 25:
Won Landis: 2/9
Lost Landis: 6/2
Lost Cartwright : 9/6
Lost Doubleday : 7/7
Lost Geoghegan : 1/1
None : 2/0
Top 50:
Won Landis : 5/10
Lost Landis : 7/4
Lost Cartwright : 12/10
Lost Doubleday : 20/18
Lost Geoghegan : 2/5
None : 4/3
Top 100:
Won Landis : 8/16
Lost Landis : 17/6
Lost Cartwright : 26/21
Lost Doubleday : 35/34
Lost Geoghegan: 3/13
None : 11/10
Top 10:
Won Landis : 1/4
Lost Landis : 2/0
Lost Cartwright : 5/3
Lost Doubleday : 0/3
Lost Geoghegan : 1/0
None : 1/0
Top 25:
Won Landis: 2/9
Lost Landis: 6/2
Lost Cartwright : 9/6
Lost Doubleday : 7/7
Lost Geoghegan : 1/1
None : 2/0
Top 50:
Won Landis : 5/10
Lost Landis : 7/4
Lost Cartwright : 12/10
Lost Doubleday : 20/18
Lost Geoghegan : 2/5
None : 4/3
Top 100:
Won Landis : 8/16
Lost Landis : 17/6
Lost Cartwright : 26/21
Lost Doubleday : 35/34
Lost Geoghegan: 3/13
None : 11/10
Randy Weigand
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
- RonCo
- GB: JL Frontier Division Director
- Posts: 19976
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2011 times
- Been thanked: 2976 times
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2015 2:50 pm
- Has thanked: 368 times
- Been thanked: 378 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
Man, I really don't like when data seems to disagree with the general impression I'd formed. Not because it I'm concerned I might be wrong but because now I need an explanation for my wrong impression, or an explanation of what the data is showing incorrectly. For example, does this accurately compare teams head to head in the playoffs?
How many of these are the same teams? Near top in both hitting and pitching? And does that matter?
I think it does. I'd like to see teams categorized by both factors. A team that has a top 5 offense one year and top 10 pitching, or 10th in offense and 2nd in pitching. I want to compare the playoff results of the teams that had top 5 offense and middle of the road pitching to top pitching and middle of the road offense. If we're doing letter grades for hitting/pitching. It's not the A/B+ vs B/A+ matchup that interests me. It's A/C versus C/A.
Who are these teams losing to?
Is there bias in which teams made the playoffs more?
11 of the top pitching teams didn't make the playoffs, compared to 10 on the top hitting side. So that seems fair.
The other question is how many of those teams were near the top in both hitting and pitching.
The lack of park factor info bothers me, too (not Randy's fault. It's just tough).
Again, not overly criticizing Randy's work. The nature of most data is to prompt more questions, not provide answers. It's great when you get clear answers, but that doesn't happen as often as you'd think.
How many of these are the same teams? Near top in both hitting and pitching? And does that matter?
I think it does. I'd like to see teams categorized by both factors. A team that has a top 5 offense one year and top 10 pitching, or 10th in offense and 2nd in pitching. I want to compare the playoff results of the teams that had top 5 offense and middle of the road pitching to top pitching and middle of the road offense. If we're doing letter grades for hitting/pitching. It's not the A/B+ vs B/A+ matchup that interests me. It's A/C versus C/A.
Who are these teams losing to?
Is there bias in which teams made the playoffs more?
11 of the top pitching teams didn't make the playoffs, compared to 10 on the top hitting side. So that seems fair.
The other question is how many of those teams were near the top in both hitting and pitching.
The lack of park factor info bothers me, too (not Randy's fault. It's just tough).
Again, not overly criticizing Randy's work. The nature of most data is to prompt more questions, not provide answers. It's great when you get clear answers, but that doesn't happen as often as you'd think.
Ted Schmidt
Twin Cities Typing Nightmares(2044-present)
California Crusaders (2021-2038)
Twin Cities Typing Nightmares(2044-present)
California Crusaders (2021-2038)
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 6652
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: Manama, Bahrain
- Has thanked: 207 times
- Been thanked: 776 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
I also have how the 2 landis teams each season fared against their peers in both hitting and pitching, will post that as soon as it is formatted, I will compile my own thoughts. Some thoughts of mine below.Ted wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 9:09 amMan, I really don't like when data seems to disagree with the general impression I'd formed. Not because it I'm concerned I might be wrong but because now I need an explanation for my wrong impression, or an explanation of what the data is showing incorrectly. For example, does this accurately compare teams head to head in the playoffs?
How many of these are the same teams? Near top in both hitting and pitching? And does that matter?
I think it does. I'd like to see teams categorized by both factors. A team that has a top 5 offense one year and top 10 pitching, or 10th in offense and 2nd in pitching. I want to compare the playoff results of the teams that had top 5 offense and middle of the road pitching to top pitching and middle of the road offense. If we're doing letter grades for hitting/pitching. It's not the A/B+ vs B/A+ matchup that interests me. It's A/C versus C/A.
Who are these teams losing to?
Is there bias in which teams made the playoffs more?
11 of the top pitching teams didn't make the playoffs, compared to 10 on the top hitting side. So that seems fair.
The other question is how many of those teams were near the top in both hitting and pitching.
The lack of park factor info bothers me, too (not Randy's fault. It's just tough).
Again, not overly criticizing Randy's work. The nature of most data is to prompt more questions, not provide answers. It's great when you get clear answers, but that doesn't happen as often as you'd think.
-It was interesting to me to see the massive disparity in teams outside the top 25 losing in the Geoghegan between pitching and hitting. I wonder if this does help illustrate Ted's point that balanced staffs (which are probably more likely to be featured on this list given that the top 100 is still less than 10% of all BBA seasons in the modern era) run into problems in short series.
-It does look like when you have an elite pitching vs elite hitting Landis, pitching wins.
Randy Weigand
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
- RonCo
- GB: JL Frontier Division Director
- Posts: 19976
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2011 times
- Been thanked: 2976 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
I think there is a tendency to focus on hitting over pitching just because offense scores and defense does not. We understand offense--or we think we do. But Pitching is partlymystical ability to create weak hitters, and partly defense. My guess is, for a simple example, the game is 45% offense, 45% pitching, and 10% defense. If true, this means that a great pitching/defense machine has an advantage that won't be as easy to see in the eye-test.
- JimBob2232
- BBA GM
- Posts: 3677
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 12:54 pm
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 228 times
- RonCo
- GB: JL Frontier Division Director
- Posts: 19976
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2011 times
- Been thanked: 2976 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
Here's an interesting correlation study. I pulled the end-of-season data for my Plays Above Average measure, and let Excel tell me the correlation between it and both Pitching Runs Allowed and Pitching Earned Runs Allowed. As would be hoped, the correlation is very strong.
PAA | R | ER | |
---|---|---|---|
PAA | 1 | ||
R | -0.693 | 1 | |
ER | -0.677 | 0.994 | 1 |
- RonCo
- GB: JL Frontier Division Director
- Posts: 19976
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2011 times
- Been thanked: 2976 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
Here's one that makes me even happier. My little PAA score correlates better to R Allowed and ER Allowed better than OOTP's combined team ZR.
ZR | PAA | R | ER | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ZR | 1.000 | |||
PAA | 0.889 | 1.000 | ||
R | -0.551 | -0.693 | 1.000 | |
ER | -0.534 | -0.677 | 0.994 | 1.000 |
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 6652
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: Manama, Bahrain
- Has thanked: 207 times
- Been thanked: 776 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
Here is a breakdown of Landis teams and how they ranked against their peers. The breakdown is HITTING/PITCHING and combines both leagues. This will help answer Ted's question about how unbalanced teams fare against each other.
24 TEAM ERA:
1995 Chicago (1/3) Defeats Des Moines (11/8)
1996 Chicago (9/12) Defeats Austin (OMA) (13/3)
1997 Hackensack (RCK) (6/1) Defeats Baltimore (BRK) (3/9)
1998 Des Moines (7/4) Defeats Chicago (6/18)
1999 Vancouver (14/2) Defeats Buffalo (SFV) (10/9)
2000 Vancouver (14/4) Defeats Des Moines (5/9)
2001 Las Vegas (7/6) Defeats Madison (3/2)
2002 California (SAC) (16/1) Defeats Seattle (4/16)
2003 Las Vegas (7/4) Defeats California (SAC) (18/1)
2004 Madison (2/1) Defeats New Orleans (1/12)
2005 Las Vegas (9/3) Defeats Baltimore (BRK) (2/12)
2006 Las Vegas (2/1) Defeats Vancouver (9/3)
2007 Des Moines (18/3) Defeats Greenville (JAX) (5/7)
2008 Las Vegas (6/1) Defeats Vancouver (18/3)
2009 Madison (3/6) Defeats Las Vegas (2/4)
2010 Hawaii (11/1) Defeats Atlantic City (3/4)
2011 Montreal (10/7) Defeats Omaha (Mex) (2/7)
2012 New Orleans (7/6) Defeats Madison (9/5)
2013 Baltimore (BRK) (6/14) Defeats Seattle (1/8)
2014 New Orleans (12/6) Defeats Valencia (6/4)
2015 Birmingham (SA) (1/16) Defeats Louisville (8/7)
2016 New Orleans (6/3) Defeats California (SAC) (18/1)
2017 Halifax (NSH) (2/17) Defeats Carolina (RCK) (1/11)
2018 Calgary (7/8) Defeats Halifax (NSH) (2/10)
2019 New Orleans (5/7) Defeats Yellow Springs (10/5)
2020 Carolina (RCK) (7/4) Defeats Halifax (NSH) (1/12)
2021 Calgary (2/8) Defeats Louisville (3/3)
2022 Atlantic City (5/6) Defeats Brooklyn (4/22)
2023 Huntsville (CHI) (13/8) Defeats Indianapolis (OMA) (1/5)
2024 California (SAC) (19/1) Defeats Atlantic City (1/16)
2025 Hawaii (5/3) Defeats Birmingham (SA) (4/5)
2026 Brooklyn (6/20) Defeats New Orleans (14/10)
2027 Las Vegas (1/3) Defeats Omaha (MEX) (20/6)
2028 Huntsville (CHI) (4/4) Defeats New Orleans (3/12)
28 TEAM ERA:
2029 Long Beach (1/11) Defeats Las Vegas (7/8)
2030 Louisville (2/2) Defeats Las Vegas (1/9)
2031 Jacksonville (3/14) Defeats Yellow Springs (8/2)
2032 Louisville (8/3) Defeats Charm City (10/7)
2033 Jacksonville (4/10) Defeats Yellow Springs (2/2)
2034 Havana (SFV) (9/1) Defeats Louisville (4/11)
30 TEAM ERA:
2035 California (SAC) (19/1) Defeats Rockville (8/3)
2036 Rockville (6/6) Defeats San Fernando (9/14)
2037 Rockville (6/2) Defeats San Fernando (1/15)
2038 Edmonton (7/5) Defeats Las Vegas (6/13)
2039 Jacksonville (16/9) Defeats Calgary (8/13)
32 TEAM ERA:
2040 Las Vegas (12/2) Defeats Louisville (1/15)
2041 Edmonton (3/15) Defeats Yellow Springs (2/2)
2042 Louisville (1/2) Defeats Edmonton (8/3)
2043 Louisville (7/16) Defeats Rockville (8/5)
24 TEAM ERA:
1995 Chicago (1/3) Defeats Des Moines (11/8)
1996 Chicago (9/12) Defeats Austin (OMA) (13/3)
1997 Hackensack (RCK) (6/1) Defeats Baltimore (BRK) (3/9)
1998 Des Moines (7/4) Defeats Chicago (6/18)
1999 Vancouver (14/2) Defeats Buffalo (SFV) (10/9)
2000 Vancouver (14/4) Defeats Des Moines (5/9)
2001 Las Vegas (7/6) Defeats Madison (3/2)
2002 California (SAC) (16/1) Defeats Seattle (4/16)
2003 Las Vegas (7/4) Defeats California (SAC) (18/1)
2004 Madison (2/1) Defeats New Orleans (1/12)
2005 Las Vegas (9/3) Defeats Baltimore (BRK) (2/12)
2006 Las Vegas (2/1) Defeats Vancouver (9/3)
2007 Des Moines (18/3) Defeats Greenville (JAX) (5/7)
2008 Las Vegas (6/1) Defeats Vancouver (18/3)
2009 Madison (3/6) Defeats Las Vegas (2/4)
2010 Hawaii (11/1) Defeats Atlantic City (3/4)
2011 Montreal (10/7) Defeats Omaha (Mex) (2/7)
2012 New Orleans (7/6) Defeats Madison (9/5)
2013 Baltimore (BRK) (6/14) Defeats Seattle (1/8)
2014 New Orleans (12/6) Defeats Valencia (6/4)
2015 Birmingham (SA) (1/16) Defeats Louisville (8/7)
2016 New Orleans (6/3) Defeats California (SAC) (18/1)
2017 Halifax (NSH) (2/17) Defeats Carolina (RCK) (1/11)
2018 Calgary (7/8) Defeats Halifax (NSH) (2/10)
2019 New Orleans (5/7) Defeats Yellow Springs (10/5)
2020 Carolina (RCK) (7/4) Defeats Halifax (NSH) (1/12)
2021 Calgary (2/8) Defeats Louisville (3/3)
2022 Atlantic City (5/6) Defeats Brooklyn (4/22)
2023 Huntsville (CHI) (13/8) Defeats Indianapolis (OMA) (1/5)
2024 California (SAC) (19/1) Defeats Atlantic City (1/16)
2025 Hawaii (5/3) Defeats Birmingham (SA) (4/5)
2026 Brooklyn (6/20) Defeats New Orleans (14/10)
2027 Las Vegas (1/3) Defeats Omaha (MEX) (20/6)
2028 Huntsville (CHI) (4/4) Defeats New Orleans (3/12)
28 TEAM ERA:
2029 Long Beach (1/11) Defeats Las Vegas (7/8)
2030 Louisville (2/2) Defeats Las Vegas (1/9)
2031 Jacksonville (3/14) Defeats Yellow Springs (8/2)
2032 Louisville (8/3) Defeats Charm City (10/7)
2033 Jacksonville (4/10) Defeats Yellow Springs (2/2)
2034 Havana (SFV) (9/1) Defeats Louisville (4/11)
30 TEAM ERA:
2035 California (SAC) (19/1) Defeats Rockville (8/3)
2036 Rockville (6/6) Defeats San Fernando (9/14)
2037 Rockville (6/2) Defeats San Fernando (1/15)
2038 Edmonton (7/5) Defeats Las Vegas (6/13)
2039 Jacksonville (16/9) Defeats Calgary (8/13)
32 TEAM ERA:
2040 Las Vegas (12/2) Defeats Louisville (1/15)
2041 Edmonton (3/15) Defeats Yellow Springs (2/2)
2042 Louisville (1/2) Defeats Edmonton (8/3)
2043 Louisville (7/16) Defeats Rockville (8/5)
Randy Weigand
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 3317
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2018 1:36 pm
- Location: South Riding, VA
- Has thanked: 728 times
- Been thanked: 485 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
Agreed. I think pitching is also helped out by the defense behind them, more around the 15% range. You could have above-average pitching but "elite" defense and all of a sudden, the pitching is also looking "elite."RonCo wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 9:36 amI think there is a tendency to focus on hitting over pitching just because offense scores and defense does not. We understand offense--or we think we do. But Pitching is partly mystical ability to create weak hitters, and partly defense. My guess is, for a simple example, the game is 45% offense, 45% pitching, and 10% defense. If true, this means that a great pitching/defense machine has an advantage that won't be as easy to see in the eye-test.
Brett "The Brain" Golden
GM: Nashville Goats 2034-2039 (The Plan® was working when I left!)
GM: Charlotte Cougars 2040-2052
GM: Rocky Mountain Oysters 2053-2057
2056 BBA Champions!
"Tonight, we take over the world!"
-- The Brain
GM: Nashville Goats 2034-2039 (The Plan® was working when I left!)
GM: Charlotte Cougars 2040-2052
GM: Rocky Mountain Oysters 2053-2057
2056 BBA Champions!
"Tonight, we take over the world!"
-- The Brain
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2015 2:50 pm
- Has thanked: 368 times
- Been thanked: 378 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
I'll pull some data from this later, Randy. But it's funny that I was involved in the most lopsided matchup, and the result is the OPPOSITE of my speculation.
2024 California (SAC) (19/1) Defeats Atlantic City (1/16)
2024 California (SAC) (19/1) Defeats Atlantic City (1/16)
Ted Schmidt
Twin Cities Typing Nightmares(2044-present)
California Crusaders (2021-2038)
Twin Cities Typing Nightmares(2044-present)
California Crusaders (2021-2038)
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 2936
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:38 am
- Has thanked: 297 times
- Been thanked: 240 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
I can relate Edmonton to a lot of the discussion in this thread. I believe our pitching good in part because our defense is great, although I think park factors are likely to have more effect.
Also, every Landis my team (Halifax or Edmonton) was in was lopsided in some way. Someone had either an elite offense, or pitching. I don’t think my teams played in any Landis where a team in the Landis wasn’t too in the league in one of those categories.
What’s interesting about this data is how often who I would deem the underdog wins. I always had feelings that this happened, but I haven’t seen it in this format. There are times the better statistical team wins, but it seems less often.
Also, every Landis my team (Halifax or Edmonton) was in was lopsided in some way. Someone had either an elite offense, or pitching. I don’t think my teams played in any Landis where a team in the Landis wasn’t too in the league in one of those categories.
What’s interesting about this data is how often who I would deem the underdog wins. I always had feelings that this happened, but I haven’t seen it in this format. There are times the better statistical team wins, but it seems less often.
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 6652
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: Manama, Bahrain
- Has thanked: 207 times
- Been thanked: 776 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
o I saw that one. On the other hand your 2037 Crusaders (the best staff ever at run prevention), lost in the doubleday to my Bears (the best offense ever at scoring runs) so you have that on your side.
Also amusing to me that when I won my Landis I allowed the fewest runs in the league.
Randy Weigand
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
- CTBrewCrew
- GB: FL Heartland Division Director
- Posts: 5197
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2019 11:20 am
- Location: Milford, CT
- Has thanked: 925 times
- Been thanked: 1337 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
2004 Madison #1 hitting & #1 pitching. Winner of landis. Are they the only one?
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 6652
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: Manama, Bahrain
- Has thanked: 207 times
- Been thanked: 776 times
Re: Hitting Vs Pitching in the Playoffs
Madison was #2 in hitting that year, they beat the #1 team in New Orleans...CTBrewCrew wrote: ↑Sat Nov 07, 2020 6:35 pm2004 Madison #1 hitting & #1 pitching. Winner of landis. Are they the only one?
Randy Weigand
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests