2058 – IFA by the Final Numbers

Beat articles, power rankings, statistical analysis, etc. goes here.
User avatar
RonCo
GB: JL Frontier Division Director
Posts: 19971
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
Has thanked: 2008 times
Been thanked: 2972 times

2058 – IFA by the Final Numbers

Post by RonCo » Mon Mar 11, 2024 4:24 pm

As folks might recall, I wrote a fairly detailed look at the IFA process for this year’s Media Guide. If you haven’t read it, yet, I’d suggest you do. The conceit of the article was that it was my attempt at pointing out that the old saw “it’s the rich getting richer” isn’t really right when applied to the IFA process. But when I wrote that, the process was still going on, so the final numbers weren’t in. Now, however, I think we can call it a day for the IFA (gotta love a rhyming bit, right?).

Of course, now that I've called it final, I'm sure someone will spend more. Because that's how this league rolls, am I right? Don't tell me when I'm done! I'll tell you when I'm done, thank you very much.

Regardless, here are some final numbers. Which I think are interesting.


Number 1: 86.7%
That’s what you get when you take the 113 players who were signed in IFA and divide it by the total pool of 129 players. 86.7%. I think that’s an interesting number.


Number 2: 102
That’s the number of players who were signed for $3.3M or less.
Of course, everyone knows about Klau Renders and his $40M price tag. But how many of us think about the 102 players who were signed to considerably more meager deals? Want another number? How about ninety? That’s the number of guys who were signed for $1M or less. So, no, the IFA process is not simply the rich getting richer.


Number 3: 138,836,820
That’s the number of dollars spent across the league on those 113 players.


Number 4: 26
That’s the number of BBA teams who acquired players in the IFA process.


Number 5: 22
That’s the number of players the Rocky Mountain signed. Almost a whole team, right?


Number 6: 7
That’s the number of teams who spent more than the $4.75M required to refrain from paying IFA tax. Of these, only four spent $8M or more.


So, yeah. That’s kinda fun to look at. Let me finish this little bit by posting the full listing of players signed and money spent by each team. Because, why not, right?

TeamPlayersSpend
RMO22$3,339,499
BIK15$2,609,000
MEX13$4,749,249
SA12$4,350,000
HAW7$1,508,004
CCJ5$4,750,000
SAC5$2,059,333
NO4$13,311,000
MTL4$4,749,166
CLG3$4,670,000
VAL3$4,575,000
DM3$110,000
ATC2$5,000,000
EDM2$4,570,400
RCK2$3,690,000
JAX1$22,775,000
POR1$21,717,171
VAN1$8,000,000
NSH1$5,224,999
LBC1$4,959,000
SFB1$4,750,000
PHX1$4,749,999
LV1$800,000
TWC1$750,000
CHI1$600,000
CHA1$470,000
113$138,836,820
GM: Bikini Krill
Nothing Matters But the Pacific Pennant
Roster

User avatar
Trebro
BBA GM
Posts: 1222
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2022 12:47 pm
Has thanked: 1100 times
Been thanked: 271 times

Re: 2058 – IFA by the Final Numbers

Post by Trebro » Sun Mar 31, 2024 4:22 pm

I ended up getting outbidded on my targets so I opted to put that $$ to signing unsigned draftees and got several of them. we'll see if that works out for me.
Rob McMonigal
Yellow Springs Nine Sep 2052 - ????

London Monarchs Aug 2052 - Sep 2052

Image

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “League Features”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests