Shown below is a chart of all of the 1st Basemen enshrined in the BBA HOF, along with their career stats. The green filled box indicates they are above their positional average, the red or white indicates they are below the average.
This chart shows how far away from the average each player is at a given stat. 1.00 is exactly the mean, higher numbers are good, lower numbers are bad. This is not a perfect chart because it gives every stat the exact same weight, which isnt exactly accurate but it gives a decent picture of what we are looking at.
HOF Analysis: 1B
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 6652
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:39 am
- Location: Manama, Bahrain
- Has thanked: 207 times
- Been thanked: 776 times
HOF Analysis: 1B
Randy Weigand
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-
League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43
- RonCo
- GB: JL Frontier Division Director
- Posts: 19974
- Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
- Has thanked: 2008 times
- Been thanked: 2972 times
Re: HOF Analysis: 1B
Interesting to see in this position exactly how consistent the split of "above and below" HoF average are. The first pass cut to note is that all the players "above average" played considerably more games than those below the line. Which is kind of "well duh" but shows clearly here. So ultimately, how much are BBA voters swayed by longevity?
I note that these stats don't do anything to adjust for era, either. So at the end of the day I'm not sure the word "accurate" is quite right here, regardless.
I note that these stats don't do anything to adjust for era, either. So at the end of the day I'm not sure the word "accurate" is quite right here, regardless.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests