Page 1 of 1

Power Rankings #3, 1999 (Up to Sim #7)

Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:00 pm
by EchoesIE
Here are the MBBA Power Rankings up to Sim #7

Name - Points Accumulation - (Position in last Power Ranking)
1) Buffalo Bison - 539 - (2)
2) California Crusaders - 535 - (1)
3) Calgary Marauders - 521 - (3)
4) Vancouver Mounties - 462 - (7)
5) Marquette Suns - 429 - (10)
6) Baltimore Monarchs - 428 - (4)
6) Valencia Stars - 428 - (16)
8) Madison Wolves - 412 - (5)
9) Birmingham Bandits - 390 - (6)
10) Greenville Moonshiners - 384 - (9)
11) Las Vegas Hustlers - 380 - (8)
12) Chicago Blacksox - 376 - (11)
13) New Orleans Crawdads - 370 - (17)
14) Des Moines Kernels - 368 - (12)
15) Hackensack Bulls - 332 - (21)
16) Phoenix Talons - 296 - (13)
17) Seattle Storm - 289 - (15)
18) Washington Bobwhites - 284 - (14)
19) Louisville Sluggers - 284 - (22)
20) Hawaii Tropics - 274 - (19)
21) Montreal Blazers - 271 - (20)
22) Omaha Barnstormers - 265 - (24)
23) Atlantic City Gamblers - 215 - (18)
24) Long Beach Surfers - 186 - (23)

---

The Formula for the 1999 Season is this:
1 Win = 10 Points
1 Run For = .5 Points
1 Run Against = -.5 Points
Starter ERA
-- 50 points for an ERA of <2.00.
-- 40 Points for an ERA of <3.00
-- 30 Points for an ERA of <4.00
-- 20 Points for an ERA of <5.00
-- 10 Points for an ERA of <6.00
Bullpen ERA
-- 50 points for an ERA of <2.00.
-- 40 Points for an ERA of <3.00
-- 30 Points for an ERA of <4.00
-- 20 Points for an ERA of <5.00
-- 10 Points for an ERA of <6.00

---

Points will not accumulate, but will be retallied each week. So, if you have a come from behind year, you will visibly see your Power Rankings rise, instead of a team that starts off hot staying at the top all year long.

Any suggestions and/or modifications are always welcome.

Re: Power Rankings #3, 1999 (Up to Sim #7)

Posted: Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:56 pm
by KCCardinalFan
I absolutely love this feature. Thank you for doing it!

Re: Power Rankings #3, 1999 (Up to Sim #7)

Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:01 am
by bschr682
it truly is a nice touch.

Re: Power Rankings #3, 1999 (Up to Sim #7)

Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:08 am
by JimBob2232
Me too. Especially climbing up to #13 after years with top 5 draft picks.

Re: Power Rankings #3, 1999 (Up to Sim #7)

Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:13 am
by scottsdale_joe
Vancouver fourth is nice.
California second 73 points ahead of me, not so nice (for me).

Good job on the ranking though.

Re: Power Rankings #3, 1999 (Up to Sim #7)

Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 8:33 am
by scottsdale_joe
Thought it would be interesting to compare the EchoesIE power ranking with the OOTP power ranking.
So I did.
Voila:
Image

Re: Power Rankings #3, 1999 (Up to Sim #7)

Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 9:01 am
by aaronweiner
This would be more interesting if it weren't absolutely identical...:)

and I'm happy to still be in the top half.

Re: Power Rankings #3, 1999 (Up to Sim #7)

Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 9:09 am
by scottsdale_joe
aaronweiner wrote:This would be more interesting if it weren't absolutely identical...:)
and I'm happy to still be in the top half.
Huh? It isn't absolutely identical.
E.g., LV is 11th in one, 7th in the other.
Birmingham is 12th and 9th

Re: Power Rankings #3, 1999 (Up to Sim #7)

Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 10:47 am
by aaronweiner
Um, apparently I should have read the chart more closely. I wonder what the "tendency" category is.

Re: Power Rankings #3, 1999 (Up to Sim #7)

Posted: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:08 am
by scottsdale_joe
aaronweiner wrote:Um, apparently I should have read the chart more closely. I wonder what the "tendency" category is.
I believe it indicates whether your ootp power ranking is trending up, down, or staying about equal.