Draft Pick Trading
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:30 am
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
Draft Pick Trading
With every star that gets traded, the returns get worse and worse and worse. This is not a good situation for a league that is interested in parity that - basically - the rich can pilfer from the poor on the trade market. I think part of the dichotomy was set up because of the poor drafts of recent past (at least that is when it all seemed to really start sliding down the slippery slope) because the general "buyer" teams (ie. good ones) just didn't have much to offer sellers and one or two atrocious deals set an expected market. If this presumption is correct, then the flooding of the market with some 1st/2nd round picks from buyer teams would go a long way in righting the market and giving seller teams some leg room to get better via the trade market - as opposed to simply just getting worse.
League Director: Kyle “agrudez” Stever*
*Also serves as chief muckraker
-Ron, 2025 media guide
*Also serves as chief muckraker
-Ron, 2025 media guide
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2015 2:50 pm
- Has thanked: 368 times
- Been thanked: 378 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
I don't know, man. I get your point that the returns have been on the weak side recently, but draft pick trading in a league with significant owner turnover always scares me. Look at the mess Havana was/is in. Imagine if Dee had been allowed to trade away picks as well.
Ted Schmidt
Twin Cities Typing Nightmares(2044-present)
California Crusaders (2021-2038)
Twin Cities Typing Nightmares(2044-present)
California Crusaders (2021-2038)
- recte44
- GB: Commissioner
- Posts: 43211
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 12:14 pm
- Location: Oconomowoc, WI
- Has thanked: 143 times
- Been thanked: 1649 times
- Contact:
Re: Draft Pick Trading
Have always been against it, and always will be. Willing to test the waters with a league vote, though. 75% to approve.
Matt Rectenwald
BBA Commissioner, GM, Las Vegas Hustlers
Milwaukee Choppers (AAA) | Reno Aces (AA) | Pahrump Ranchers (A) | Kingston Legends (SA) | Roswell Aliens (R)
BBA Commissioner, GM, Las Vegas Hustlers
Milwaukee Choppers (AAA) | Reno Aces (AA) | Pahrump Ranchers (A) | Kingston Legends (SA) | Roswell Aliens (R)
- Lane
- GB: Vice Commissioner
- Posts: 6818
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:18 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Has thanked: 532 times
- Been thanked: 719 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
This risk could be lessened somewhat by limiting traded picks to 1 year out.Ted wrote:I don't know, man. I get your point that the returns have been on the weak side recently, but draft pick trading in a league with significant owner turnover always scares me. Look at the mess Havana was/is in. Imagine if Dee had been allowed to trade away picks as well.
Stephen Lane
Vice Commissioner / Historian
General Manager, Long Beach Surfers
Since 2026
Ex-GM, Amsterdam Neptunes, 2025 EBA Champions
Vice Commissioner / Historian
General Manager, Long Beach Surfers
Since 2026
Ex-GM, Amsterdam Neptunes, 2025 EBA Champions
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:30 am
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
Yeah, it needs a cap on the years to keep franchises from getting run into the ground by mismanagement. Only being able to trade picks from the next draft (ie. it resets once the ammy draft is completed) seems perfectly fine to me as a preventive measure.Lane wrote:This risk could be lessened somewhat by limiting traded picks to 1 year out.Ted wrote:I don't know, man. I get your point that the returns have been on the weak side recently, but draft pick trading in a league with significant owner turnover always scares me. Look at the mess Havana was/is in. Imagine if Dee had been allowed to trade away picks as well.
League Director: Kyle “agrudez” Stever*
*Also serves as chief muckraker
-Ron, 2025 media guide
*Also serves as chief muckraker
-Ron, 2025 media guide
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 5630
- Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2015 2:50 pm
- Has thanked: 368 times
- Been thanked: 378 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
I'm against it in general, but in addition to limiting trading to only one year out or whatever, what about a "draft pick trading season". Like they can only be traded from June 1 to the deadline. Heats up in season trades, and keeps misguided teams who made a splashy offseason deal or two from mortgaging the future before they realize that one old free agent does not a champion make.
Ted Schmidt
Twin Cities Typing Nightmares(2044-present)
California Crusaders (2021-2038)
Twin Cities Typing Nightmares(2044-present)
California Crusaders (2021-2038)
- Lane
- GB: Vice Commissioner
- Posts: 6818
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:18 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Has thanked: 532 times
- Been thanked: 719 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
Fred Hernandez disagrees.Ted wrote:one old free agent does not a champion make.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Stephen Lane
Vice Commissioner / Historian
General Manager, Long Beach Surfers
Since 2026
Ex-GM, Amsterdam Neptunes, 2025 EBA Champions
Vice Commissioner / Historian
General Manager, Long Beach Surfers
Since 2026
Ex-GM, Amsterdam Neptunes, 2025 EBA Champions
- Edward Murphy
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 2041
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 9:10 am
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 26 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
Kyle I agree with you about the poor draft pools. Lets spend the time getting better quality (and/or) quantity players for all teams.
- Lane
- GB: Vice Commissioner
- Posts: 6818
- Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2016 8:18 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Has thanked: 532 times
- Been thanked: 719 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
I was referring to an actual championship team, the 2029 LB Surfers.felipe wrote:Ummm...I don't think it's Fred; it's probably the upgrades at catcher, outfield, pitching, first base, too
Clearly he was the magic piece of the puzzle, since the Surfers are garbage this year.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Stephen Lane
Vice Commissioner / Historian
General Manager, Long Beach Surfers
Since 2026
Ex-GM, Amsterdam Neptunes, 2025 EBA Champions
Vice Commissioner / Historian
General Manager, Long Beach Surfers
Since 2026
Ex-GM, Amsterdam Neptunes, 2025 EBA Champions
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:30 am
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
How so?bschr682 wrote:I actually think draft pick trading would make the situation Kyle is talking about even worse.
League Director: Kyle “agrudez” Stever*
*Also serves as chief muckraker
-Ron, 2025 media guide
*Also serves as chief muckraker
-Ron, 2025 media guide
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 8038
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:24 am
- Has thanked: 306 times
- Been thanked: 383 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
The haves trade off risky picks for actual players from the have nots. The gap widens. Sure some of the have nots on occasion will get a boost when they get lucky enough that the extra picks all develop but it wont be reliable and so as a whole I think it would be bad. Plus the whole cruddy team gets run completely into the ground leading to a revolving door of GM's.
Im not saying there are no pros to the idea but I think the cons far, far outweigh them.
Im not saying there are no pros to the idea but I think the cons far, far outweigh them.
GM Vancouver Mounties
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:46 pm
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 70 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
I know this is dead in the water, but I do think a regulated pick trading 'season' would have merits in this league. A good portion of the talent in this league comes from bumps and international signings/scout finds, so even a team that annually trades away picks still has other avenues to get decent prospects (hell, I've developed a reasonable farm despite trading away the only 1st rounder who hasn't lumped on me).
Having a window for trading picks from All-Star Game to the Arbitration sim, with a limit of only picks from the next draft being tradeable, could make sense. You run the risk of a GM trading away 1st round pick after 1st round pick, but you can still have that happen by trading former 1st round pick after former 1st round pick.
Having a window for trading picks from All-Star Game to the Arbitration sim, with a limit of only picks from the next draft being tradeable, could make sense. You run the risk of a GM trading away 1st round pick after 1st round pick, but you can still have that happen by trading former 1st round pick after former 1st round pick.
Greenville Moonshiners/Jacksonville Hurricanes GM: 2026-Present
Jacksonville Hurricanes GM: (1251-1018); 2029, 2031, 2034-38 Div. Champions
Paris Patriots GM: 2025 (79-83)
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 7681
- Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:30 am
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
Risky picks as opposed to useless prospects?bschr682 wrote:The haves trade off risky picks for actual players from the have nots. The gap widens. Sure some of the have nots on occasion will get a boost when they get lucky enough that the extra picks all develop but it wont be reliable and so as a whole I think it would be bad. Plus the whole cruddy team gets run completely into the ground leading to a revolving door of GM's.
Im not saying there are no pros to the idea but I think the cons far, far outweigh them.
Sunshine was basically given away as a salary dump. You don't think Brooklyn would've loved to get a risky pick?
This is both empirical as well as subjective. Every time I talk trade with someone they try to get 3+ star MLers for 2 star prospects. It's supposed to be the other way around (unless you're talking about expensive geriatrics). It's because, imo, teams are jealously guarding half-way decent (and even often times below average) prospects because the bad drafts left their pools so barren. I draw this conclusion because it wasn't like this before the drafts started being that way. Sure, every once in awhile there was a head scratcher in the past, but at this point they are ALL headscratchers.
In the end this is simply not good for the league to continue with the status quo - so if you don't like this idea then I beseech you to think of another to fix the problem.
League Director: Kyle “agrudez” Stever*
*Also serves as chief muckraker
-Ron, 2025 media guide
*Also serves as chief muckraker
-Ron, 2025 media guide
- indiansfan
- BBA GM
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:39 pm
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 245 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
Yep. Aging guys with terrible contracts aren't going to get much in return. Working as intended.
Kevin
Calgary Pioneers 2004-
BBA Landis Champs 2018, 21
FL Champs 2018, 21, 39
FL Pacific Champs: 2016, 19, 21, 34
FL Frontier Champs 2039
FL WC 2018, 26-29, 31-32, 35
JL WC 2040, 41, 44
FL MOY 2019, 34
JL MOY 2044
Calgary Pioneers 2004-
BBA Landis Champs 2018, 21
FL Champs 2018, 21, 39
FL Pacific Champs: 2016, 19, 21, 34
FL Frontier Champs 2039
FL WC 2018, 26-29, 31-32, 35
JL WC 2040, 41, 44
FL MOY 2019, 34
JL MOY 2044
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 3553
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:46 pm
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 70 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
Aren't Sunshine and Chip aging geriatrics? (both 34 with recent declines in ratings). Neither are in the OSA Top 20 Hitters/Pitchers anymore.agrudez wrote:Risky picks as opposed to useless prospects?bschr682 wrote:The haves trade off risky picks for actual players from the have nots. The gap widens. Sure some of the have nots on occasion will get a boost when they get lucky enough that the extra picks all develop but it wont be reliable and so as a whole I think it would be bad. Plus the whole cruddy team gets run completely into the ground leading to a revolving door of GM's.
Im not saying there are no pros to the idea but I think the cons far, far outweigh them.
Sunshine was basically given away as a salary dump. You don't think Brooklyn would've loved to get a risky pick?
This is both empirical as well as subjective. Every time I talk trade with someone they try to get 3+ star MLers for 2 star prospects. It's supposed to be the other way around (unless you're talking about expensive geriatrics). It's because, imo, teams are jealously guarding half-way decent (and even often times below average) prospects because the bad drafts left their pools so barren. I draw this conclusion because it wasn't like this before the drafts started being that way. Sure, every once in awhile there was a head scratcher in the past, but at this point they are ALL headscratchers.
In the end this is simply not good for the league to continue with the status quo - so if you don't like this idea then I beseech you to think of another to fix the problem.
I do agree with adding pick trading though I don't know it will really have the same effect you hope it will. Trading of draft picks will just be another tool that a good GM will use well and a bad GM will use poorly. Unfortunately (fortunately?), bad GMs don't usually hang around to clean up a mess, so the majority of the teams in greatest need are subjected to the crapshoot of a new GM. So if one of those bad teams gets a good GM (which, I think we actually have landed on some pretty good GMs for the lesser teams in the league now), having the ability to rebuild through acquiring draft picks would be a good thing and maybe help them, but they are acquiring later round picks who aren't necessarily going to be any better than the prospects they can acquire. To me, the benefit of pick trading is that it would potentially open up more trading options for the rebuilding team as most teams would have draft picks, while only a few may have the need for the player and the prospects to make a deal.
Teams looking to offload big-contract, star players and not getting a monumental return isn't new to the league though. Remember when Greenville traded away superstar players Doug Glover and Martin Felix for LITERALLY NOTHING!? I wasn't in the league then, but I definitely felt the repercussions of that move taking over the gutted franchise Greenville wound up becoming.
Maybe a compromise could be just allowing the trading of recently drafted players
Greenville Moonshiners/Jacksonville Hurricanes GM: 2026-Present
Jacksonville Hurricanes GM: (1251-1018); 2029, 2031, 2034-38 Div. Champions
Paris Patriots GM: 2025 (79-83)
- indiansfan
- BBA GM
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:39 pm
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 245 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
Yeah I would be more likely to allow the trading of recently drafted players than draft picks
Kevin
Calgary Pioneers 2004-
BBA Landis Champs 2018, 21
FL Champs 2018, 21, 39
FL Pacific Champs: 2016, 19, 21, 34
FL Frontier Champs 2039
FL WC 2018, 26-29, 31-32, 35
JL WC 2040, 41, 44
FL MOY 2019, 34
JL MOY 2044
Calgary Pioneers 2004-
BBA Landis Champs 2018, 21
FL Champs 2018, 21, 39
FL Pacific Champs: 2016, 19, 21, 34
FL Frontier Champs 2039
FL WC 2018, 26-29, 31-32, 35
JL WC 2040, 41, 44
FL MOY 2019, 34
JL MOY 2044
- aaronweiner
- BBA GM
- Posts: 12055
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:56 pm
- Has thanked: 53 times
- Been thanked: 776 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
Then it's a difference without a distinction. I like the system as we have it right now.
- indiansfan
- BBA GM
- Posts: 3450
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:39 pm
- Has thanked: 12 times
- Been thanked: 245 times
Re: Draft Pick Trading
I prefer to keep it the same but there is a distinction. Trading a player you have drafted is a trade made by the current GM. Trading picks left the current GM trade away things that the next GM doesn't get. Present vs future.
Kevin
Calgary Pioneers 2004-
BBA Landis Champs 2018, 21
FL Champs 2018, 21, 39
FL Pacific Champs: 2016, 19, 21, 34
FL Frontier Champs 2039
FL WC 2018, 26-29, 31-32, 35
JL WC 2040, 41, 44
FL MOY 2019, 34
JL MOY 2044
Calgary Pioneers 2004-
BBA Landis Champs 2018, 21
FL Champs 2018, 21, 39
FL Pacific Champs: 2016, 19, 21, 34
FL Frontier Champs 2039
FL WC 2018, 26-29, 31-32, 35
JL WC 2040, 41, 44
FL MOY 2019, 34
JL MOY 2044
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests