2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Discuss the Brewster Baseball Association here!
crobillard
Ex-GM
Posts: 2936
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:38 am
Has thanked: 297 times
Been thanked: 240 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by crobillard » Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:14 am

jleddy wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:56 pm
recte44 wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:03 pm
The Edmonton Jackrabbits traded 27-year-old starting pitcher Bobby Lynch to the Calgary Pioneers, getting 20-year-old right fielder Myeong-hwan Kim, 18-year-old third baseman Pepe Espinosa, 19-year-old starting pitcher Emilio Brazini, 21-year-old starting pitcher Edgardo Torres and 19-year-old starting pitcher Fekadu Bbosa in return.
Late to the party and the trade thread is locked, so allow me to comment...

Whoa. WHOA. WHOA!!! Love the return Chris got for -- more than I thought he'd get but also not a gross overpay by the Pioneers -- and kudos to Kevin for putting it all on the table for a Landis run...what a rotation in Calgary! And let's not forget this is an interdivision trade (both this season and post-realignment), so it'll make for some great "What if..." and "Remember when..." discussions down the road.

Exciting stuff!

Sincerely,

A Shellshocked Fellow Frontier GM
Absolutely. I think it’s a fantastic deal for both sides. I struggled mightily with trading Lynch, but my financial concerns weren’t going away. I needed to do something big. I had two other offers that were similar to this one.

I’m not sure whether I picked the best one, I just went with my gut. Bobby Lynch is a force man. He’s going to help big time in the playoffs and beyond. Calgary has a really deep farm system. That’s why Kevin and I got talking. His farm system will keep churning.

I’m happy it was interdivision. It will be weird facing Bobby Lynch but I’m excited about it. I don’t want to call up anyone too early so I think I’m punting this year unless my shitty players decide they want to help me win games.

User avatar
RonCo
GB: JL Frontier Division Director
Posts: 19960
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
Has thanked: 2005 times
Been thanked: 2969 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by RonCo » Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:33 am

jleddy wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:01 am
handaspencer wrote:
Tue Aug 06, 2019 10:46 pm
And everyone is telling me I am asking too much for Vicente. Looks like I will be raising his price tag.
Great point, I was wondering the same thing...if Lynch ended up being traded early, would it in someway set the market leading up to the deadline? Sounds like it has, at least for one party.
The market is going to be interesting. It could be really hot, or could fall completely off.
GM: Bikini Krill
Nothing Matters But the Pacific Pennant
Roster

User avatar
aaronweiner
BBA GM
Posts: 12044
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:56 pm
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 770 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by aaronweiner » Wed Aug 07, 2019 7:22 am

Also, team on fire. Up to the best record in the BBA.

User avatar
shoeless.db
BBA GM
Posts: 2342
Joined: Wed May 29, 2019 10:25 pm
Has thanked: 1846 times
Been thanked: 1101 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by shoeless.db » Wed Aug 07, 2019 8:47 am

Man, I love the Lynch trade! Good on Calgary for going after the Landis. All chips to the center of the table, baby!
Sacramento Mad Popes
-- Vic Caleca Team News Award Winner 2052
-- BBA Champion 2053
— The Heartland Sucks
-- Pacific Champs 2040, 2042, 2043, 2047, 2048, 2049, 2051, 2053, 2054, 2058
Life is a bit more beautiful when time is measured by the half inning rather than the half hour.

crobillard
Ex-GM
Posts: 2936
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:38 am
Has thanked: 297 times
Been thanked: 240 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by crobillard » Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:14 am

aaronweiner wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 7:22 am
Also, team on fire. Up to the best record in the BBA.
18-6 in July. Disgusting. Get out.

User avatar
indiansfan
BBA GM
Posts: 3447
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:39 pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 243 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by indiansfan » Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:39 am

I gave up a ton but I had a surplus of SP down on the farm and still have the best ones. Lynch, Gilliam, and Pierce give me a great threesome if I can make the playoffs. Of course I have to sign Lynch or else this trade will be a disaster. However many years ago when Chris ran a different team, I seem to remember trading him a HOF SS that I couldn’t afford by the name of Archer and he went to a Landis. I got a prospect signed as an IFA by the name of Dam Leonard who had a pretty impressive career and I went to a couple Landis rounds.
Last edited by indiansfan on Wed Aug 07, 2019 11:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Kevin

Image
Calgary Pioneers 2004-
BBA Landis Champs 2018, 21
FL Champs 2018, 21, 39
FL Pacific Champs: 2016, 19, 21, 34
FL Frontier Champs 2039
FL WC 2018, 26-29, 31-32, 35
JL WC 2040, 41, 44
FL MOY 2019, 34
JL MOY 2044

crobillard
Ex-GM
Posts: 2936
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 7:38 am
Has thanked: 297 times
Been thanked: 240 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by crobillard » Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:55 am

indiansfan wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 9:39 am
I gave up a ton but I had a surplus of SP down on the farm and still have the best ones. Lynch, Gilliam, and Pierce give me a great threesome if I can make the playoffs. Of Cote’s I have to sign Lynch or else this trade will be a disaster. However many years ago when Chris ran a different team, I seem to remember trading him a HOF SS that I couldn’t afford by the name of Archer and he went to a Landis. I got a prospect signed as an IFA by the name of Dam Leonard who had a pretty impressive career and I went to a couple Landis rounds.
Lol great memory. Leonard was such a beast for so long. Do whatever you want with Lynch. Your team will be fine either way. I hope he gets you a Landis.

User avatar
RonCo
GB: JL Frontier Division Director
Posts: 19960
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
Has thanked: 2005 times
Been thanked: 2969 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by RonCo » Wed Aug 07, 2019 10:02 am

If Lynch gets Calgary a Landis, the deal will not be a disaster no matter what. Looks like he got blitzed in his first outing, though...and if there's a dark cloud it's that Lynch has been giving up home runs at a shuddering pace recently...and he's moving from a park that suppresses the long ball to one that juices them.

So I thought it was a fascinating roll of the dice. Rooting for Calgary ti make it work. Then again, as Kevin said--they've got the farm system for it.
GM: Bikini Krill
Nothing Matters But the Pacific Pennant
Roster

User avatar
ae37jr
BBA GM
Posts: 3009
Joined: Fri Feb 05, 2016 1:37 pm
Location: Davenport, FL
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 664 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by ae37jr » Wed Aug 07, 2019 10:05 am

This season is actually starting to give me anxiety. In the next week or so I play 6 games at Vegas and Charm City.

My right brain is thinking... You're 2 games out of a wild card spot. You can do this and steal some playoff money...gotta stack the lineup with lefty hitters and call up some high movement pitchers. You actually have tons of both of those better then what's on the current BBA team. DO IT and shock the world!!!

Meanwhile my left brain is thinking... stay the course buddy. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Your team is terrible. It's all been luck. The future is where it's at right now. Don't start any unnecessary clocks or stunt long term growth just to get an even shittier draft pick you idiot.
Alan Ehlers
GM of the Twin Cities River Monster
Image

User avatar
handaspencer
GBC GM
Posts: 462
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:17 pm
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by handaspencer » Wed Aug 07, 2019 10:29 am

ae37jr wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 10:05 am
This season is actually starting to give me anxiety. In the next week or so I play 6 games at Vegas and Charm City.

My right brain is thinking... You're 2 games out of a wild card spot. You can do this and steal some playoff money...gotta stack the lineup with lefty hitters and call up some high movement pitchers. You actually have tons of both of those better then what's on the current BBA team. DO IT and shock the world!!!

Meanwhile my left brain is thinking... stay the course buddy. It's a marathon, not a sprint. Your team is terrible. It's all been luck. The future is where it's at right now. Don't start any unnecessary clocks or stunt long term growth just to get an even shittier draft pick you idiot.
Thats why you make the big bucks for these type decisions

bschr682
Ex-GM
Posts: 8038
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:24 am
Has thanked: 306 times
Been thanked: 383 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by bschr682 » Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:53 pm

This is the kind of thing that needs more consideration when we vote GM of the year. Both what Calgary is doing by going for it and what Brooklyn is talking about. I think a lot of people are too risk averse. Prospects burn out all the time. It blows to see some kid absolutely killing it in AA or AAA and being held down for service time reasons only to have his career flame out. Those minor league years could have been infinitely more useful as min sal major league years. Sometime you have to be aggressive and take what looks like a long term L for the short term W.

But as Brooklyn pointed out, you can’t be an idiot about it. If your team is smoke and mirrors maybe don’t trade the farm.
GM Vancouver Mounties

User avatar
aaronweiner
BBA GM
Posts: 12044
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:56 pm
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 770 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by aaronweiner » Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:04 pm

bschr682 wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:53 pm
This is the kind of thing that needs more consideration when we vote GM of the year. Both what Calgary is doing by going for it and what Brooklyn is talking about. I think a lot of people are too risk averse. Prospects burn out all the time. It blows to see some kid absolutely killing it in AA or AAA and being held down for service time reasons only to have his career flame out. Those minor league years could have been infinitely more useful as min sal major league years. Sometime you have to be aggressive and take what looks like a long term L for the short term W.

But as Brooklyn pointed out, you can’t be an idiot about it. If your team is smoke and mirrors maybe don’t trade the farm.
You're totally right. Did you know that the team that currently has the best record in the league traded away their starting shortstop during the year TO Calgary, and lost their closer, 4.5 WAR starting first baseman, and a 4.5 WAR starting pitcher this offseason?

I just happened to notice.

User avatar
RonCo
GB: JL Frontier Division Director
Posts: 19960
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
Has thanked: 2005 times
Been thanked: 2969 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by RonCo » Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:31 pm

bschr682 wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:53 pm
This is the kind of thing that needs more consideration when we vote GM of the year. Both what Calgary is doing by going for it and what Brooklyn is talking about. I think a lot of people are too risk averse. Prospects burn out all the time. It blows to see some kid absolutely killing it in AA or AAA and being held down for service time reasons only to have his career flame out. Those minor league years could have been infinitely more useful as min sal major league years. Sometime you have to be aggressive and take what looks like a long term L for the short term W.

But as Brooklyn pointed out, you can’t be an idiot about it. If your team is smoke and mirrors maybe don’t trade the farm.
These are always tough decisions that have to be assessed in context of everything else that's surrounding them.

On the whole, I think I see more young kids being brought up too early and putting up pedestrian numbers while they develop than I see kids staying in the minors too long and busting. But it can certainly happen both ways--which is what makes these things fun, I suppose.

In this case (as a counter example), you can argue that if Bobby Lynch's first year hadn't been wasted on a useless/losing half-year, Edmonton would have been in better shape today. You can also try to argue that if he'd been kept in the minors that last few months maybe he'd have regressed. I think the first option is demonstrably true, and the second is deeply unlikely. However, when Lynch was brought up, I think the league as a whole was full of praise even though Edmonton was clearly not going anywhere back then.

So the hard part is how to not be an idiot about it. :)
GM: Bikini Krill
Nothing Matters But the Pacific Pennant
Roster

User avatar
RonCo
GB: JL Frontier Division Director
Posts: 19960
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
Has thanked: 2005 times
Been thanked: 2969 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by RonCo » Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:38 pm

A pure fan's perspective is to always asks for the best performing team possible at all times. A pure GM's view is to always create maximum "value" ... whatever he thinks that is--because that will eventually turn into wins. Which, I think, is at the core of what Ted was basically discussing in his Guide to Winning.
GM: Bikini Krill
Nothing Matters But the Pacific Pennant
Roster

bschr682
Ex-GM
Posts: 8038
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:24 am
Has thanked: 306 times
Been thanked: 383 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by bschr682 » Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:44 pm

RonCo wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:31 pm
bschr682 wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:53 pm
This is the kind of thing that needs more consideration when we vote GM of the year. Both what Calgary is doing by going for it and what Brooklyn is talking about. I think a lot of people are too risk averse. Prospects burn out all the time. It blows to see some kid absolutely killing it in AA or AAA and being held down for service time reasons only to have his career flame out. Those minor league years could have been infinitely more useful as min sal major league years. Sometime you have to be aggressive and take what looks like a long term L for the short term W.

But as Brooklyn pointed out, you can’t be an idiot about it. If your team is smoke and mirrors maybe don’t trade the farm.
These are always tough decisions that have to be assessed in context of everything else that's surrounding them.

On the whole, I think I see more young kids being brought up too early and putting up pedestrian numbers while they develop than I see kids staying in the minors too long and busting. But it can certainly happen both ways--which is what makes these things fun, I suppose.

In this case (as a counter example), you can argue that if Bobby Lynch's first year hadn't been wasted on a useless/losing half-year, Edmonton would have been in better shape today. You can also try to argue that if he'd been kept in the minors that last few months maybe he'd have regressed. I think the first option is demonstrably true, and the second is deeply unlikely. However, when Lynch was brought up, I think the league as a whole was full of praise even though Edmonton was clearly not going anywhere back then.

So the hard part is how to not be an idiot about it. :)
Had lynch not been called up, Edmonton gets that extra year. Gets the keep him this season. Then next season when he lumps to 5/4/9 he has to let him walk for absolutely nothing.
GM Vancouver Mounties

usnspecialist
Ex-GM
Posts: 6652
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 9:39 am
Location: Manama, Bahrain
Has thanked: 207 times
Been thanked: 776 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by usnspecialist » Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:45 pm

My counter to the service time argument is that if they struggle early then it keeps the arb numbers lower and more manageable.

EDIT: I should say I am historically one of the more aggressive when it comes to promotion.
Randy Weigand

Havana Sugar Kings/San Fernando Bears: 32-50 (1608-1481)
Des Moines Kernels: 52-

League Champion- 34
JL Champion- 34
FL Champion- 36, 37
JL Southern- 34
FL Pacific- 37, 39
Wild Card- 33, 35, 36, 40, 43

Image

bschr682
Ex-GM
Posts: 8038
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 11:24 am
Has thanked: 306 times
Been thanked: 383 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by bschr682 » Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:50 pm

aaronweiner wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:04 pm
bschr682 wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 12:53 pm
This is the kind of thing that needs more consideration when we vote GM of the year. Both what Calgary is doing by going for it and what Brooklyn is talking about. I think a lot of people are too risk averse. Prospects burn out all the time. It blows to see some kid absolutely killing it in AA or AAA and being held down for service time reasons only to have his career flame out. Those minor league years could have been infinitely more useful as min sal major league years. Sometime you have to be aggressive and take what looks like a long term L for the short term W.

But as Brooklyn pointed out, you can’t be an idiot about it. If your team is smoke and mirrors maybe don’t trade the farm.
You're totally right. Did you know that the team that currently has the best record in the league traded away their starting shortstop during the year TO Calgary, and lost their closer, 4.5 WAR starting first baseman, and a 4.5 WAR starting pitcher this offseason?

I just happened to notice.
Your team doesn’t pass the “12 year old with google access” test.
GM Vancouver Mounties

jleddy
Ex-GM
Posts: 3216
Joined: Mon May 27, 2019 5:46 pm
Location: Long Beach, CA
Has thanked: 3377 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by jleddy » Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:53 pm

usnspecialist wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:45 pm
My counter to the service time argument is that if they struggle early then it keeps the arb numbers lower and more manageable.
That's like wanting to date a hideous-looking woman because she won't be courted by anyone else.

"My $#!? doesn't work in the playoffs." - Billy Beane Joe Lederer

User avatar
RonCo
GB: JL Frontier Division Director
Posts: 19960
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 10:48 pm
Has thanked: 2005 times
Been thanked: 2969 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by RonCo » Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:58 pm

bschr682 wrote:
Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:44 pm
Had lynch not been called up, Edmonton gets that extra year. Gets the keep him this season. Then next season when he lumps to 5/4/9 he has to let him walk for absolutely nothing.
That's certainly possible.

It's also possible that at age 27 he keeps his ratings for three more solid seasons before fading. Of the two, my projection is that keeping his ratings is the more likely one, but it's maybe 80/20, so anything could still happen.

My view here is that of the 30 or 40 really brilliant young players who are up in the BBA right now, probably seven or eight are up too early for their own good (and probably at the detriment to their organization's value), and another seven or eight are borderline cases that won't be really known for awhile. That still means twenty-five or so are clearly well made promotions--meaning either they brought them up at the right time, or if they were held back for any service time concerns it didn't seem to hurt their ratings any.
GM: Bikini Krill
Nothing Matters But the Pacific Pennant
Roster

User avatar
handaspencer
GBC GM
Posts: 462
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2018 4:17 pm
Has thanked: 66 times
Been thanked: 88 times

Re: 2039, Sim #18 Chatter

Post by handaspencer » Wed Aug 07, 2019 1:58 pm

I think it depends on the timing of when they are ready. If its June and the kid is ready probably not wise to delay until the 3rd week of April the following year. If its opening day the kid is ready I will always make him wait a couple weeks because I want that extra year in their prime rather than the first 2 weeks of their rookie season.

For example Kevin Mackeith was brought up the last week of the season in 2037 and when I took over he had 7 service days and his clock started which made absolutely no sense to me. Why waste 7 days when your out of the playoffs? I had to make him play 25 games in AAA in 2038 to get his clock correct so I could get that 7th year and I am so glad I did this.
Last edited by handaspencer on Wed Aug 07, 2019 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply Previous topicNext topic

Return to “League Chatter”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests