2002 Draft Discussion
- aaronweiner
- BBA GM
- Posts: 12396
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:56 pm
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 934 times
Re: 2002 Draft Discussion
I'm not unhappy with my pick. Picking 16th, I didn't expect to get a future All-Star, but I may have gotten a starting shortstop, or at least a superior major league utility guy.
Re: 2002 Draft Discussion
Yeah Garcia is a nice little pick at #16. He can play 3B, SS. Has some speed. A good eye. Seems to play over his ratings a little. Very nice pick up at that slot.
-
- Ex-GM
- Posts: 1559
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 5:51 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: 2002 Draft Discussion
I absolutely agree that you take the blue chip pitching prospect over the blue chip hitting prospect (unless he is at a key position such as shortstop) 100 percent of the time. In the case of the first pick, I honestly see Murray's lower movement talent and the potential for that to be on the bottom end making him too high a risk for #1. I don't see him as blue chip.
If his 7 talent is actually at the bottom end of the 7 range, it means that a little lump takes him down to an 11 or 12 in movement. Would you still see him as better than Guzman in that case? Of course, if it is on the high end of 7 and turns out to be an 8, he is a Hall of Famer.
It is my feeling that when you have the #1 pick, that is not a place to take a gamble. Especially when you are as bad as we are.
If his 7 talent is actually at the bottom end of the 7 range, it means that a little lump takes him down to an 11 or 12 in movement. Would you still see him as better than Guzman in that case? Of course, if it is on the high end of 7 and turns out to be an 8, he is a Hall of Famer.
It is my feeling that when you have the #1 pick, that is not a place to take a gamble. Especially when you are as bad as we are.
Re: 2002 Draft Discussion
Murray also throws it at 96-98 MPH which is a strain on the arm. He missed 3 weeks last season with an elbow sprain. So hes a risk for injury. His college BABIP numbers are pretty high also. His career BABIP in college was .335. And thats probably because of the lack of movement again. He K's a lot of guys but when they make contact they hit him pretty hard.
So I can see what Long Beach is saying. When you add the fact that Guzman is a lefty that might top out at 10 power vs. righties I can understand the pick.
So I can see what Long Beach is saying. When you add the fact that Guzman is a lefty that might top out at 10 power vs. righties I can understand the pick.
Re: 2002 Draft Discussion
Still waiting for my first pick in this year's draft. The wait is killing me... lol
JL Atlantic Div Champ 2014
Past team(s)
Greenville Moonshiners (2008 - 2016) 653-805,.448 PCT
Omaha Barnstormers (2000 - 2007) 627-534,.540 PCT
Tim Imasa
GM: Greenville Moonshiners
Email: timothyimasa@gmail.com
Past team(s)
Greenville Moonshiners (2008 - 2016) 653-805,.448 PCT
Omaha Barnstormers (2000 - 2007) 627-534,.540 PCT
Tim Imasa
GM: Greenville Moonshiners
Email: timothyimasa@gmail.com
- aaronweiner
- BBA GM
- Posts: 12396
- Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 1:56 pm
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 934 times
Re: 2002 Draft Discussion
I hope you are right. I was really happy to see him sitting there in the 2nd round. He has a lot of raw power which I hope can develop with time. Just hope his K's aren't WAY too high.aaronweiner wrote:Best bargain so far: Hal O'Keefe. I was considering him at #16.
GM - Atlantic City Gamblers
Re: 2002 Draft Discussion
I'm really happy to get Alex Sanchez at pick 55. I was considering him with my supplemental pick. I think people were turned off by the infield error rating but I'm hoping that will improve. The range and arm is good and he actually won a gold glove last season.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests