The Brewster

Please review and let me know if I have missed anything.

~Mike

You can view tracker here: http://montybrewster.net/forums/viewtop ... 32&t=23887

Mine isn't close. Double check please.

cool thanks man (50th post)

Apologies if I am misreading the tracker, but where are the player spotlights/features counted under? Not seeing any column or breakout of where the points for mine came from. Thanks for your help.

Looks good for me

@CTBrewCrew pretty sure Shaw doesn't have 61 TN

Looks good

pandan wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 01, 2023 4:18 pm

Apologies if I am misreading the tracker, but where are the player spotlights/features counted under? Not seeing any column or breakout of where the points for mine came from. Thanks for your help.

Let me take a look.....it helps if all are prefaced with a season or year (i.e. 56.x or 2056. etc). How many did you do?

recte44 wrote: ↑

Mon Oct 02, 2023 8:31 am

@CTBrewCrew pretty sure Shaw doesn't have 61 TN

Fixed - he had 0. Took from wrong column. All set now. Thanks for the 2nd set of eyes!

CTBrewCrew wrote: ↑

Sat Oct 07, 2023 10:55 am

pandan wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 01, 2023 4:18 pm

Apologies if I am misreading the tracker, but where are the player spotlights/features counted under? Not seeing any column or breakout of where the points for mine came from. Thanks for your help.

Let me take a look.....it helps if all are prefaced with a season or year (i.e. 56.x or 2056. etc). How many did you do?

Fixed.

CTBrewCrew wrote: ↑

Sat Oct 07, 2023 10:55 am

pandan wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 01, 2023 4:18 pm

Apologies if I am misreading the tracker, but where are the player spotlights/features counted under? Not seeing any column or breakout of where the points for mine came from. Thanks for your help.

Let me take a look.....it helps if all are prefaced with a season or year (i.e. 56.x or 2056. etc). How many did you do?

I wrote two. But I don't see a column where this value would go.

aaronweiner wrote: ↑

Sat Sep 30, 2023 4:50 pm

Mine isn't close. Double check please.

I can see that you have updated this somewhat. Mine is still not correct.

aaronweiner wrote: ↑

Sat Oct 07, 2023 7:42 pm

aaronweiner wrote: ↑

Sat Sep 30, 2023 4:50 pm

Mine isn't close. Double check please.

I can see that you have updated this somewhat. Mine is still not correct.

What did I miss?

CTBrewCrew wrote: ↑

Sat Oct 07, 2023 9:34 pm

aaronweiner wrote: ↑

Sat Oct 07, 2023 7:42 pm

aaronweiner wrote: ↑

Sat Sep 30, 2023 4:50 pm

Mine isn't close. Double check please.

I can see that you have updated this somewhat. Mine is still not correct.

My TN is wrong, you gave me a repeat feature and I’m not checking my post count but I’m gonna ask you double check.

Maybe I'm reading this tracker wrong, but it looks like you've got me down for 4 TNs when I have posted 5 so far. Thanks.

aaronweiner wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 08, 2023 5:31 am

CTBrewCrew wrote: ↑

Sat Oct 07, 2023 9:34 pm

aaronweiner wrote: ↑

Sat Oct 07, 2023 7:42 pm

I can see that you have updated this somewhat. Mine is still not correct.

My TN is wrong, you gave me a repeat feature and I’m not checking my post count but I’m gonna ask you double check.

Ill dbl check u tomorrow morning. Ur repeat feature would be the 1st round draft analysis featue

JimSlade wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 08, 2023 11:23 am

Maybe I'm reading this tracker wrong, but it looks like you've got me down for 4 TNs when I have posted 5 so far. Thanks.

You okay - it depends on when i did it. The 5th (and anything else) will be caught at EOY. I will still check it in the morning

CTBrewCrew wrote: ↑

Thu Oct 12, 2023 7:39 pm

aaronweiner wrote: ↑

Sun Oct 08, 2023 5:31 am

CTBrewCrew wrote: ↑

Sat Oct 07, 2023 9:34 pm

My TN is wrong, you gave me a repeat feature and I’m not checking my post count but I’m gonna ask you double check.

Ill dbl check u tomorrow morning. Ur repeat feature would be the 1st round draft analysis featue

That's not what a repeat feature means. It means things that repeat in-season like the "Walkoff Watch" or the "Defensive Plays Above Average," things that repeat and are formulaic dozens of times a year, not something that's fully newly written every year. That's to add content while preventing people from over-milking short form features, not for full-length, brand-new material.

I figured that might be your formulation, and I understand and appreciate the misinterpretation. We're not quibbling over a lot of points anyway but it should be a feature, not a repeat feature; otherwise we'd have to give repeat feature points to things, say, in the Media Guide because there was also one of those last year.

Yup let me change that for you. Thats what i though a reoccurring feature was