Search found 462 matches
- Sat Dec 21, 2019 6:54 pm
- Forum: League Announcements
- Topic: Rule 5 Draft Continues as Planned
- Replies: 34
- Views: 8027
Re: Rule 5 Draft Continues as Planned
Help me understand, I have not been following much today. I thought losing the year was due to Recte changing the rule 5 from December to January. But know I see it’s an ootp bug. Which one is it?
- Sat Dec 21, 2019 12:46 pm
- Forum: New Applicants
- Topic: Application from Ben Heuring - New Applicant
- Replies: 18
- Views: 3776
- Fri Dec 20, 2019 1:39 pm
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
- Replies: 57
- Views: 19402
Re: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
What about all the teams that just started clocks on guys that didn’t need to? It really don’t start their clocks. When someone is placed on the 40 man all that really means is they begin 3 years known as the option years. In theory you can hold someone on your 40 man for 9 seasons after placing th...
- Fri Dec 20, 2019 1:25 pm
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
- Replies: 57
- Views: 19402
Re: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
What about all the teams that just started clocks on guys that didn’t need to? It really don’t start their clocks. When someone is placed on the 40 man all that really means is they begin 3 years known as the option years. In theory you can hold someone on your 40 man for 9 seasons after placing th...
- Fri Dec 20, 2019 11:24 am
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
- Replies: 57
- Views: 19402
Re: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
I would kill it this year because teams didn’t have the opportunity to plan ahead losing a year unexpectedly. But it needs put back into December next year so this don’t happen again.
- Fri Dec 20, 2019 11:22 am
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
- Replies: 57
- Views: 19402
Re: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
True, Kevin...if you pick through the whole transaction change, you can find them. But you can't just scan the log and know if a player was moved from waivers or not. There is some clue in the language...a player "optioned" to AAA was not waived first. A player "assigned" was likely designated for ...
- Fri Dec 20, 2019 10:39 am
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
- Replies: 57
- Views: 19402
Re: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
But those guys you waive are still rule5 eligible, so they are free of being claimed on waivers, they are not protected from Rule 5. For example let’s say I decided to waive Jim Antolin. As of this file he is not in the draft pool so nobody has the opportunity to put him in their draft list because...
- Fri Dec 20, 2019 10:20 am
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
- Replies: 57
- Views: 19402
Re: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
I don’t follow. Every single player not on a 40 man that meets the requirements is eligible. Even if they are on waivers they can still be rule 5 drafted. If they squeak through waivers because of the waiver length issue sure no one can waiver claim them but they are still rule 5 eligible and not p...
- Fri Dec 20, 2019 9:59 am
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
- Replies: 57
- Views: 19402
Re: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
Moving it to January probably caused this issue for sure. Usually rule 5 is December
- Fri Dec 20, 2019 9:57 am
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
- Replies: 57
- Views: 19402
Re: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
That is an issue and also several teams already have the 40 man full or close to full and have a few guys in the draft pool they might protect. In order to protect those guys they must be put on the 40 man with a corresponding move to remove someone on the 40 man. Because we have been simming more ...
- Fri Dec 20, 2019 9:36 am
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
- Replies: 57
- Views: 19402
Re: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
We can fix the waiver issue this sim. The other issues can’t really do much at this point.
- Fri Dec 20, 2019 9:13 am
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
- Replies: 57
- Views: 19402
Re: Too Many With Rule 5 Eligibility?
That is an issue and also several teams already have the 40 man full or close to full and have a few guys in the draft pool they might protect. In order to protect those guys they must be put on the 40 man with a corresponding move to remove someone on the 40 man. Because we have been simming more t...
- Thu Dec 19, 2019 3:18 pm
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: 2041, IFA/FA Sim #4 Chatter
- Replies: 24
- Views: 10515
- Thu Dec 19, 2019 2:46 pm
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: 2041, IFA/FA Sim #4 Chatter
- Replies: 24
- Views: 10515
Re: 2041, IFA/FA Sim #4 Chatter
I bid 10.2 lesson learned that’s not close to enough I will remember next time
- Thu Dec 19, 2019 11:54 am
- Forum: Participation Points and Rewards
- Topic: Montreal spends for new stadium
- Replies: 5
- Views: 1520
Re: Montreal spends for new stadium
Well it needs built first
- Thu Dec 19, 2019 8:57 am
- Forum: League Announcements
- Topic: Offseason Compensation Thresholds 2040-2041
- Replies: 13
- Views: 28707
Re: Offseason Compensation Thresholds 2040-2041
RP Lorenzo Montalvo had 1.3 WAR last season and should give Montreal a 2nd rounder but is not on this list
- Thu Dec 19, 2019 7:33 am
- Forum: Draft Central
- Topic: 2041, Rule 6 Draft
- Replies: 23
- Views: 4184
- Wed Dec 18, 2019 10:10 pm
- Forum: Draft Central
- Topic: 2041, Rule 6 Draft
- Replies: 23
- Views: 4184
- Wed Dec 18, 2019 5:24 pm
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: 2041, Winter Meetings/FA Sim #3
- Replies: 26
- Views: 6335
Re: 2041, Winter Meetings/FA Sim #3
The penalty is pretty severe if you go over, I believe if you spend 2 million it actually cost you 4 mill or something like that. The challenge for someone like myself is because that penalty is so severe it impacts my ability to acquire talent for the big club at the same time due to my budget. Tea...
- Tue Dec 17, 2019 8:50 pm
- Forum: League Chatter
- Topic: 2041, FA Sim #2 Chatter
- Replies: 34
- Views: 4068
Re: 2041, FA Sim #2 Chatter
We really need to fix the Waiver period again for the offseason. We are simming 14 days but waivers is only 8 days so nobody actually shows up on waivers.