GoldenOne wrote: ↑

Fri Jan 19, 2024 6:36 pm

I am still getting Discord notifications and post-sim emails. Slouck is not getting them.

I was just coming to ping him too. Thanks.

CTBrewCrew wrote: ↑

Fri Jan 19, 2024 3:58 pm

welcome - PPT Tracker has been updated to reflect new GM Change

Where is it at? I was looking the other day but couldn't find it.

4 for 4

On the block *C John Adams -Salary dump. Considering DFA'ing but really don't want to just cut him. Make an offer. Not looking for much of anything. "Best" (Don't let "Best" scare you away. Really looking for an extreme flyer.) offer before 3/12/24 sim gets him. Decent option for a rebuilding team ...

You left at the same exact time. I was offered Charm City originally. Didn't want to take the job because you left the team in great shape and I wanted a challenge. Not saying I would have taken the team to the level Dave has though. I just enjoy tight budgets and getting the most out of 45 rated p...

The Pharaoh's find themselves once again without a GM. A fanbase not impressed by the 55-69 record under Brandon Slouck now wonder who will follow in his footsteps. And wonder why the BBA even gave him a call? "He goes from a team that won it all in 2055 to a team that won it all in 2056," one anony...

Lane wrote: ↑

Wed Jan 17, 2024 9:51 am

The turnaround of twin cities after the Ted era is impressive

I think I left around when that shoe started to drop. Looks like Alan navigated it well which isn't a surprise.

Been awhile since I've had access to the settings of S+ as an admin, but there are settings for illegal contracts so they at least get highlighted in S+ when they're signed. Not sure if you can always see if it's illegal or not. And not even sure you can have the settings to match up with the BBA's.

Looking around Rocky Mountain to get a lay of the land and noticed Federico Linares's contract appears to be illegal. Currently under 5 years ML time and deal signed prior to the 2057 season.

RonCo wrote: ↑

Fri Jan 12, 2024 1:47 pm

At 140 AB and $16m due, you kind of hope Menzies opts out of that last year of his contract.

I can never predict when they will. I'd think he would just because he still has talent. If you're a SS away and have the cap, you gotta overpay and take that chance.

Man, Menzies still getting it done. Banged up but still productive. He was someone I wanted bad in his younger days.

Too hard to understand. Please provide graph.

He missed all of 2056 with injury and his stuff has lumped. I think it may be a simple as this. His K/9 is down 5% and BABIP is at a career high .327. His changeup was at least a fringe average pitch before and now it's probably about useless. I know the conversation above mentioned that it's proba...

Very sad. As others have said, good to know he had his family with him. Condolences to them.

Rankings according to BNN 1) Bannon McThomas | COF | AA | ETA: 2058 A 7th round pick back in 2052, McThomas has shot up the prospect rankings. Currently, he's the #2 prospect overall in the GBC. His AA numbers probably mirror his career projections (.216/.358/.431). Your typical power hitting corne...

I would like a Starting Pitcher.

It's a combo of 1 & 2. If someone has insane stats at AAA but isn't developed fully, I'll take a shot. And if someone is developed but maybe is starting to get to that point of needing the push despite not putting up gaudy numbers, I'll move them up if there's a spot. 3 rarely comes into play. Ideal...

I saw Ron post on the other question about you fixing the balancing so that's enough for me to vote yes without really knowing.

hot take: why not enable inter-league trading or a GBC posting fee that would incentivize GBC GMs to let their stars go?? maybe a posting fee in PP or similar It'd be interesting. Rule 6 kind of did this. I think you got a Rule 5 eligible player back from a team who took your player in the Rule 6. ...

hot take: why not enable inter-league trading or a GBC posting fee that would incentivize GBC GMs to let their stars go?? maybe a posting fee in PP or similar It'd be interesting. Rule 6 kind of did this. I think you got a Rule 5 eligible player back from a team who took your player in the Rule 6. ...